ArticlePloS one2021
Comparison of the secretory murine DNase1 family members expressed in Pichia pastoris.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Different results despite high homology: Comparative expression of human and murine DNase1 in Pichia pastoris.PloS one · 2025Article
- Systemic mechanisms of necrotic cell debris clearance.Cell death & disease · 2024Review
- Neutrophils' Extracellular Trap Mechanisms: From Physiology to Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soluble nucleases of the deoxyribonuclease 1 (DNase1) family facilitate DNA and chromatin disposal (chromatinolysis) during certain forms of cell differentiation and death and participate in the suppression of anti-nuclear autoimmunity as well as thrombotic microangiopathies caused by aggregated neutrophil extracellular traps. Since a systematic and direct comparison of the specific activities and properties of the secretory DNase1 family members is still missing, we expressed and purified recombinant murine DNase1 (rmDNase1), DNase1-like 2 (rmDNase1L2) and DNase1-like 3 (rmDNase1L3) using Pichia pastoris. Employing different strategies for optimizing culture and purification conditions, we achieved yields of pure protein between ~3 mg/l (rmDNase1L2 and rmDNase1L3) and ~9 mg/l (rmDNase1) expression medium. Furthermore, we established a procedure for post-expressional maturation of pre-mature DNase still bound to an unprocessed tri-N-glycosylated pro-peptide of the yeast α-mating factor. We analyzed glycosylation profiles and determined specific DNase activities by the hyperchromicity assay. Additionally, we evaluated substrate specificities under various conditions at equimolar DNase isoform concentrations by lambda DNA and chromatin digestion assays in the presence and absence of heparin and monomeric skeletal muscle α-actin. Our results suggest that due to its biochemical properties mDNase1L2 can be regarded as an evolutionary intermediate isoform of mDNase1 and mDNase1L3. Consequently, our data show that the secretory DNase1 family members complement each other to achieve optimal DNA degradation and chromatinolysis under a broad spectrum of biological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.