Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34328602›Full record

ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2022

Rethinking the Term "Limited English Proficiency" to Improve Language-Appropriate Healthcare for All.

Pilar Ortega, Tiffany M Shin, Glenn A Martínez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A language-matching model to improve equity and efficiency of COVID-19 contact tracing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pilar OrtegaDepartments of Medical Education and Emergency Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, 808 S. Wood Street, MC 591, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. POrtega1@uic.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5136-1805
Tiffany M ShinDepartment of Pediatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Glenn A MartínezDepartment of Modern Languages and Literatures, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of limited English proficiency (LEP) presents significant challenges when applied to the healthcare needs of the diverse and growing multilingual population in the U.S. We expound on the following ways in which the concept of LEP is problematic: the ethnocentric notion of a "primary language," the ambiguous idea of "limited ability," and the deficit-oriented construct of "language assistance." We provide examples that illustrate the negative healthcare impact of LEP terminology, including the unaccounted-for complexities of health communication within the concept of "primary language," the "limited abilities" of health professionals whose language skills are often unassessed, and the ignored role of "language assistance" resources such as interpreters as essential collaborators. Finally, we propose rethinking LEP by (a) reframing patient language using the term non-English language preference and (b) assessing health professional non-English language skills. These actionable strategies have the potential to improve language-appropriate healthcare for diverse populations.

Indexed as

Limited English ProficiencyCommunication BarriersHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLanguagePhysician-Patient RelationsHealthcare communicationLanguage assistanceLanguage barriersLanguage concordanceLimited English proficiencyMedical interpretersPatient-centered communication

Identifiers

PMID34328602
PMCPMC8323079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.