Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34328559›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2022

The influence of biofilm maturation on fluoride's anticaries efficacy.

Hadeel M Ayoub, Richard L Gregory, Qing Tang, Frank Lippert

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Ecological influence by colonization of fluoride-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hadeel M AyoubDental Health Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Richard L GregoryDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Comprehensive Care, School of Dentistry, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Qing TangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Frank LippertDepartment of Cariology, Operative Dentistry and Dental Public Health, School of Dentistry, Indiana University, 415 Lansing Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202-2876, USA. flippert@iu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1944-2960
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives(1) To explore the influence of biofilm maturation and timing of exposure on fluoride anticaries efficacy and (2) to explore biofilm recovery post-treatment.

methodsBovine enamel specimens were utilized in a pH cycling model (28 subgroups [n = 18]). Each subgroup received different treatments [exposure]: sodium fluoride [NaF]; stannous fluoride [SnF

resultsObjective 1: Early exposure to fluorides produced protective effects against lesion progression in surface microhardness and mineral loss, but not for lesion depth. Objective 2: Early exposure slowed the demineralization process. SnF

conclusionEarlier exposure to SnF CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study provides an understanding of biofilm-fluoride interaction with mature biofilm (e.g., hard-to-reach areas, orthodontic patients) and fluoride's sustainable effect hours/days after brushing.

Indexed as

FluoridesTooth DemineralizationAnimalsBiofilmsCariostatic AgentsCattleHumansSodium FluorideTin FluoridesTooth RemineralizationCariostatic AgentsFluoridesSodium FluorideTin FluoridesBiofilm maturationBiofilm recoveryExposure periodFluorideFluoride anticaries efficacy

Identifiers

PMID34328559
OpenAlexW3186438650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.