Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34328519›Full record

ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Development of the inpatient quality of care of surgically treated patients with a proximal femoral fracture in North Rhine-Westphalia : Analysis of 61,249 treatment courses based on data from external inpatient quality assurance].

C J Neumann, U Schulze-Raestrup, C M Müller-Mai, R Smektala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Preoperative stay under 48 h after admission for proximal femur fractures is linked to fewer complications and better outcomes.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C J NeumannKlinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum-Langendreer, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, In der Schornau 23-25, 44892, Bochum, Deutschland. c.j.neumann@gmx.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7444-0410
U Schulze-RaestrupQualitätssicherung NRW, Ärztekammer Westfalen-Lippe, Münster, Deutschland.
C M Müller-MaiKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Sportmedizin, Klinikum Lünen, Lünen, Deutschland.
R SmektalaKlinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum-Langendreer, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, In der Schornau 23-25, 44892, Bochum, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveEvery year in Germany over 100,000 people, mostly of older age, suffer a proximal femoral fracture. Increasing case numbers in connection with an aging population and a relatively large number of concomitant diseases requiring treatment make everyday care more difficult. It is therefore of great importance to observe the quality of care for these patients using relevant quality parameters in order to be able to derive implications for everyday treatment practice. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe data of the external inpatient quality assurance from North Rhine-Westphalia for the years 2007-2008 and 2017-2018 were analyzed and the time periods compared. In addition, based on the documented secondary diagnosis and other influencing parameters, a risk adjustment was carried out with the aid of a logistic regression model with respect to the outcomes of general and surgical complications and mortality. Both osteosynthetically and endoprosthetically treated patients were taken into account. A total of 61,249 cases were included in the study.

resultsPositive developments could be observed in the area of surgical complications and wound infections with decreases of 1.2% and 0.8%, respectively. Patients with cardiovascular diseases had a particularly poor outcome. Here, improvements in the subcategory of cardiovascular events were found for general complications. The mortality remained unchanged at 6%. Operative activity on the weekends increased significantly. Patients whose hospital admission was related to the weekend did not show an increased risk of complications or mortality. Although the proportion of patients who were operated on after more than 48 h was reduced from 11.4% to 8.2%, the operation (> 24 h) was still delayed in 26.8% of cases.

conclusionAgainst the background of increasing performance demands on the healthcare system, the results document improvements in some central areas of inpatient treatment. Nevertheless, the development of strategies for the further reduction of the preoperative waiting times in a medically justifiable manner is required. Internal concomitant diseases have a decisive influence on patient outcome. Thus, an adequate treatment of the multimorbid patient collective is to be established in everyday practice on the basis of close cooperation between geriatric traumatology and geriatric internal medicine departments.

Indexed as

Femoral FracturesFemoral Neck FracturesAgedFracture Fixation, InternalHumansInpatientsRisk AdjustmentCare researchFemoral neck fractureGeriatric traumatologyPertrochanteric femoral fractureRegister data

Identifiers

PMID34328519
PMCPMC9349128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.