Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34328424›Full record

ReviewJMIR medical informatics2021

The Fast Health Interoperability Resources (FHIR) Standard: Systematic Literature Review of Implementations, Applications, Challenges and Opportunities.

Muhammad Ayaz, Muhammad F Pasha, Mohammed Y Alzahrani, Rahmat Budiarto, Deris Stiawan

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 122 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. A Systematic Review of Electronic Medical Record Driven Quality Measurement and Feedback Systems.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Telemedicine documentation in neurology and telestroke: a global scoping review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammad AyazMalaysia School of Information Technology, Monash University, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-7828-8337
Muhammad F PashaMalaysia School of Information Technology, Monash University, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-9848-8950
Mohammed Y AlzahraniInformation Technology Department, College of Computer Science & Information Technology, Albaha University, Albaha, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9726-6088
Rahmat BudiartoInformatics Department, Faculty of Science & Technology, Universitas Alazhar Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-6374-4731
Deris StiawanDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-9302-1868

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformation technology has shifted paper-based documentation in the health care sector into a digital form, in which patient information is transferred electronically from one place to another. However, there remain challenges and issues to resolve in this domain owing to the lack of proper standards, the growth of new technologies (mobile devices, tablets, ubiquitous computing), and health care providers who are reluctant to share patient information. Therefore, a solid systematic literature review was performed to understand the use of this new technology in the health care sector. To the best of our knowledge, there is a lack of comprehensive systematic literature reviews that focus on Fast Health Interoperability Resources (FHIR)-based electronic health records (EHRs). In addition, FHIR is the latest standard, which is in an infancy stage of development. Therefore, this is a hot research topic with great potential for further research in this domain.

objectiveThe main aim of this study was to explore and perform a systematic review of the literature related to FHIR, including the challenges, implementation, opportunities, and future FHIR applications.

methodsIn January 2020, we searched articles published from January 2012 to December 2019 via all major digital databases in the field of computer science and health care, including ACM, IEEE Explorer, Springer, Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. We identified 8181 scientific articles published in this field, 80 of which met our inclusion criteria for further consideration.

resultsThe selected 80 scientific articles were reviewed systematically, and we identified open questions, challenges, implementation models, used resources, beneficiary applications, data migration approaches, and goals of FHIR.

conclusionsThe literature analysis performed in this systematic review highlights the important role of FHIR in the health care domain in the near future.

Indexed as

CDAclinical document architectureEHRelectronic health recordFast Health Interoperability ResourcesFHIRhealth standardHL7SMARTSubstitutable Medical Applications Reusable Technologiessystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID34328424
PMCPMC8367140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.