Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34328420›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2021

Trends in Stress Throughout Pregnancy and Postpartum Period During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Study Using Ecological Momentary Assessment and Data From the Postpartum Mothers Mobile Study.

Serwaa S Omowale, Andrea Casas, Yu-Hsuan Lai, Sarah A Sanders, Ashley V Hill, Meredith L Wallace, Stephen L Rathbun, Tiffany L Gary-Webb, Lora E Burke, Esa M Davis and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Serwaa S OmowaleSchool of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1331-5111
Andrea CasasDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9385-3456
Yu-Hsuan LaiDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7254-7617
Sarah A SandersBehavioral and Community Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1432-022X
Ashley V HillDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3535-1404
Meredith L WallaceDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3951-890X
Stephen L RathbunDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4704-5316
Tiffany L Gary-WebbDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9843-1084
Lora E BurkeDepartment of Health and Community Systems, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2434-9867
Esa M DavisDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6658-1528
Dara D MendezBehavioral and Community Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3999-1991
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

Postpartum Weight Retention and Cardiometabolic Disparities: The Effects of Contexual, Psychosocial, and Behavioral FactorsR01HL135218 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MENDEZ, DARA DANEEN · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
Comparison of two Screening Strategies for Gestational DiabetesR01HD079647 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DAVIS, ESA M · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL135218NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD079647
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStress is associated with adverse birth and postpartum health outcomes. Few studies have longitudinally explored racial differences in maternal stress in a birthing population in the United States during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

objectiveThis study aimed to do the following: (1) assess changes in reported stress before, during, and after initial emergency declarations (eg, stay-at-home orders) were in place due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and (2) assess Black-White differences in reported stress in a pregnant and postpartum population from Southwestern Pennsylvania.

methodsWe leveraged data from the ongoing Postpartum Mothers Mobile Study (PMOMS), which surveys participants in real time throughout the pregnancy and postpartum periods via ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and smartphone technology. We analyzed data from a subset of PMOMS participants (n=85) who were either Black or White, and who submitted EMA responses regarding stress between November 1, 2019, and August 31, 2020, the time frame of this study. We divided data into four phases based on significant events during the COVID-19 pandemic: "pre" phase (baseline), "early" phase (first case of COVID-19 reported in United States), "during" phase (stay-at-home orders), and "post" phase (stay-at-home orders eased). We assessed mean stress levels at each phase using linear mixed-effects models and post hoc contrasts based on the models.

resultsOverall mean stress (0=not at all to 4=a lot) during the pre phase was 0.8 for Black and White participants (range for Black participants: 0-3.9; range for White participants: 0-2.8). There was an increase of 0.3 points (t

conclusionsThere was an overall increase in mean stress levels in this subset of pregnant and postpartum participants during the same time as the emergency declarations/stay-at-home orders in the United States. Compared to baseline, mean stress levels remained elevated when stay-at-home orders eased. We found no significant difference in the mean stress levels by race. Given that stress is associated with adverse birth outcomes and postpartum health, stress induced by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic may have adverse implications for birthing populations in the United States. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/13569.

Indexed as

COVID-19ecological momentary assessmenthealth status disparitiespandemicspostpartumpregnancypsychological stress

Identifiers

PMID34328420
PMCPMC8457341
OpenAlexW3186595569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.