Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34328233›Full record

ArticlePaediatric and perinatal epidemiology2021

Effect of prenatal screening on trends in perinatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies before and after the introduction of prenatal screening: A population-based study in the Northern Netherlands.

Francesca Bardi, Jorieke E H Bergman, Katelijne Bouman, Jan Jaap Erwich, Leonie K Duin, Hermien E K Walle, Marian K Bakker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Public's perception and attitude toward genetic testing in Jazan region.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesca BardiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5311-2207
Jorieke E H BergmanDepartment of Genetics, EUROCAT Registration Northern Netherlands, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3929-3619
Katelijne BoumanDepartment of Genetics, EUROCAT Registration Northern Netherlands, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan Jaap ErwichDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Leonie K DuinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hermien E K WalleDepartment of Genetics, EUROCAT Registration Northern Netherlands, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marian K BakkerDepartment of Genetics, EUROCAT Registration Northern Netherlands, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5098-6400
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerinatal mortality in foetuses/children with congenital anomalies remains high. Prenatal diagnosis, essential for risk assessment and organisation of perinatal/postnatal care, offers parents the opportunity to consider the termination of pregnancy. In times of quick changes in prenatal screening programmes, it is relevant to evaluate the effect of prenatal screening on perinatal mortality rates.

objectivesThe objective of this study was to study trends in early foetal and perinatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies before/after the introduction of the Dutch prenatal screening programme.

methodsThis population-based cohort study included 8535 foetuses/neonates with congenital anomalies born in the Northern Netherlands between 2001 and 2017. Total deaths were defined as sum of early foetal (before 24 weeks' gestation) and perinatal deaths (from 24 weeks' gestation till day 7 post-partum). Foetal deaths were categorised into spontaneous or elective termination of pregnancy for foetal anomalies (TOPFA). Trends in total mortality as well as early foetal and perinatal mortality were studied. Joinpoint regression was used to calculate the average annual percentage chance (AAPC) and identify linear trends in mortality within subperiods.

resultsTotal and perinatal mortality were 17% and 4%. Total mortality was higher in abnormal karyotype and central nervous system anomalies. We observed an increase in total mortality over time: 11.9% in 2001 versus 21.9% in 2017 (AAPC 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5, 3.7), caused by an increase in early foetal mortality from 5.5% to 19.2% (AAPC 8.7, 95% CI 4.7, 12.9) and a decrease in perinatal mortality from 6.4% to 2.7% (AAPC -5.6, 95% CI -10.0, -1.0). The increase in early foetal mortality reflects an increase in TOPFA from 3.6% to 16.9% (AAPC 8.3, 95% CI 4.2, 12.7), mostly occurring at 13-14 and 20-23 weeks' gestation.

conclusionsThe introduction of the prenatal screening programme led to a decrease in perinatal mortality among foetuses and neonates with congenital anomalies and a marked increase in early foetal mortality before 24 weeks' gestation due to higher rates of TOPFA.

Indexed as

Perinatal DeathPerinatal MortalityPrenatal DiagnosisCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornNetherlandsPregnancycongenital anomaliesfoetal mortalityperinatal mortalityprenatal screening

Identifiers

PMID34328233
PMCPMC8596841
OpenAlexW3183536151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.