Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34328135›Full record

Observational studyActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2021

The psychological impact of the Coronavirus emergency on physicians and nurses: an Italian observational study.

Maria Chiara Carriero, Luana Conte, Marica Calignano, Roberto Lupo, Antonino Calabrò, Pietro Santoro, Giovanna Artioli, Cosimo Caldararo, Maurizio Ercolani, Maicol Carvello and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Quality of Life and Psychophysical Consequences in Individuals with Intestinal Stoma: An Observational Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria Chiara CarrieroSanta Chiara" Institute, Rome (RM), Italy . chiaracarriero92@gmail.com.
Luana ConteLaboratory of Interdisciplinary Research Applied to Medicine (DReAM), University of Salento and ASL (Local Health Authority) Lecce (LE), Italy; Laboratory of Biomedical Physics and Environment, Department of Mathematics and Physics "E. De Giorgi", University of Salento, Lecce (LE), Italy. luana.conte@unisalento.it.
Marica CalignanoUniversity Hospital, Parma (Italy). marica.calignano@gmail.com.
Roberto Lupo"San Giuseppe da Copertino" Hospital, ASL (Local Health Authority) Lecce, Italy . roberto.lupo@uniba.it.
Antonino Calabrò"Nuovo Ospedale degli Infermi" Hospital, ASL (Local Health Authority), Biella, Italy. anto.cala76@gmail.com.
Pietro SantoroMathCounseling Lecce, Italy. pietro.santoro@hotmail.com.
Giovanna ArtioliIRCCS, "Santa Maria Nuova" Hospital, USL (Local Health Authority) - Reggio Emilia, Italy . giovanna.artioli@ausl.re.it.
Cosimo CaldararoUniversity of Bari, Lecce, Italy. cosimo.caldararo@uniba.it.
Maurizio Ercolani"ASUR Marche Area Vasta 2" Health Mental Department, Ancona, Italy. mau72.ercolani@libero.it.
Maicol CarvelloBrisighella Community Hospital, ASL (Local Health Authority) of Romagna, Brisighella, Italy. maicol.carvello2@unibo.it.
Antonio Leo"Santa Chiara" Institute, Lecce, Italy. toninoleo@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Coronavirus has put a strain on the response capacity of health systems and there are various psychological effects on health workers. AIM OF THE STUDY: To investigate the psychological impact of the coronavirus emergency on physicians and nurses. MATERIALS AND

methodsA study was conducted on a sample of nurses and physicians (n=770), who were asked to fill in a questionnaire investigating physical and psychological problems. It also included the IES (Impact Event Scale), STAI (State Trait Anxiety Inventory) scale and BDI (Beck Depression Inventory).

results87.7% of the sample was represented by nurses (n=675), 12.3% (n=95) by physicians. 52.3% (n=403) of the participants believed that they had not received good training on the correct use of Personal Protective Equipment. 18.2% (n=140) declared that they had experienced a moment in which they had had to choose among the patients whom to treat for an essential therapy. Among the psychological symptoms, stress (76.2%; n=587), anxiety (59.4%; n=457) and depression (11.8%) prevailed and only 3.9% of the healthcare personnel sought help from a psychologist. The total score of the IES-R scale was 3.47. A significant association emerged between exposure and the risk of contagion (p-value = 0.003), stress was more present among nurses than among physicians (77.5% vs. 67.4%; p = 0.003). Among physical symptoms, headache (52.2%; n=402) and pressure injuries (24.8% n= 191) prevailed.

conclusionsThe results of the study show that mental health monitoring of health workers, who are at risk of developing major psychological disorders, is a priority.

Indexed as

COVID-19NursesPhysiciansAnxietyHumansItalyStress, PsychologicalSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34328135
PMCPMC8383225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.