Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34328080›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Social fluidity mobilizes contagion in human and animal populations.

Ewan Colman, Vittoria Colizza, Ephraim M Hanks, David P Hughes, Shweta Bansal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ewan ColmanDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2551-8589
Vittoria ColizzaINSERM, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP UMRS 1136), F75012, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2113-2374
Ephraim M HanksDepartment of Statistics, Eberly College of Science, Penn State University, State College, United States.
David P HughesDepartment of Entomology, College of Agricultural Sciences, Penn State University, State College, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9954-8919
Shweta BansalDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1740-5421

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and other group-living animals tend to distribute their social effort disproportionately. Individuals predominantly interact with a small number of close companions while maintaining weaker social bonds with less familiar group members. By incorporating this behavior into a mathematical model, we find that a single parameter, which we refer to as

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalModels, TheoreticalSocial BehaviorAnimalsBasic Reproduction NumberCommunicable DiseasesDisease OutbreaksHumansanimal behaviourcomputational biologydensity dependenceepidemiologyfrequency dependenceglobal healthinfectious diseasemathematical modellingnonesocialitysystems biology

Identifiers

PMID34328080
PMCPMC8324292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.