Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34328078›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Fast and flexible estimation of effective migration surfaces.

Joseph Marcus, Wooseok Ha, Rina Foygel Barber, John Novembre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Conservation Units for Anadromous Arctic Char (Evolutionary applications · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Network-based genetic monitoring of landscape fragmentation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joseph Marcus *Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0923-9881
Wooseok Ha *Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9069-854X
Rina Foygel Barber *Department of Statistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.
John Novembre *Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5345-0214

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN GENETICS AND REGULATIONT32GM007197 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ROTHMAN-DENES, LUCIA B. B · 1985 to 2020
$17.0M
Extending Tools for Visualization of Geographic Structure in Population Genomic DataR01GM132383 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI NOVEMBRE, JOHN · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM132383NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial population genetic data often exhibits 'isolation-by-distance,' where genetic similarity tends to decrease as individuals become more geographically distant. The rate at which genetic similarity decays with distance is often spatially heterogeneous due to variable population processes like genetic drift, gene flow, and natural selection. Petkova et al., 2016 developed a statistical method called Estimating Effective Migration Surfaces (EEMS) for visualizing spatially heterogeneous isolation-by-distance on a geographic map. While EEMS is a powerful tool for depicting spatial population structure, it can suffer from slow runtimes. Here, we develop a related method called Fast Estimation of Effective Migration Surfaces (FEEMS). FEEMS uses a Gaussian Markov Random Field model in a penalized likelihood framework that allows for efficient optimization and output of effective migration surfaces. Further, the efficient optimization facilitates the inference of migration parameters per edge in the graph, rather than per node (as in EEMS). With simulations, we show conditions under which FEEMS can accurately recover effective migration surfaces with complex gene-flow histories, including those with anisotropy. We apply FEEMS to population genetic data from North American gray wolves and show it performs favorably in comparison to EEMS, with solutions obtained orders of magnitude faster. Overall, FEEMS expands the ability of users to quickly visualize and interpret spatial structure in their data.

Indexed as

Gene FlowGenetics, PopulationModels, TheoreticalSelection, GeneticAnimalsGenetic VariationGenotypeNormal DistributionNorth AmericaProbabilityWolvescomputational biologydata visualizationeffective migrationevolutionary biologygraph learningnoneoptimizationpopulation geneticsspatial smoothingsystems biology

Identifiers

PMID34328078
PMCPMC8324296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.