Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34327865›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2021

Supporting control programs on African swine fever in Ukraine through a knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey targeting backyard farmers.

Violeta Muñoz-Gómez, Oleksii Solodiankin, Nataliia Rudova, Anton Gerilovych, Serhiy Nychyk, Natalia Hudz, Tetiana Ukhovska, Mykola Sytiuk, Volodymyr Polischuk, David Mustra and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Violeta Muñoz-GómezSAFOSO AG, Liebefeld, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5874-0317
Oleksii SolodiankinInstitute of Experimental and Clinical Veterinary Medicine (IECVM), Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Nataliia RudovaInstitute of Experimental and Clinical Veterinary Medicine (IECVM), Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Anton GerilovychInstitute of Experimental and Clinical Veterinary Medicine (IECVM), Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Serhiy NychykInstitute of Veterinary Medicine (IVM), Kyiv, Ukraine.
Natalia HudzInstitute of Veterinary Medicine (IVM), Kyiv, Ukraine.
Tetiana UkhovskaInstitute of Veterinary Medicine (IVM), Kyiv, Ukraine.
Mykola SytiukInstitute of Veterinary Medicine (IVM), Kyiv, Ukraine.
Volodymyr PolischukNational University of Life and Environmental Sciences (NULES), Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0002-9512-5855
David MustraLabyrinth Global Health, Inc., St Petersburg, Florida, USA.
Marco De NardiSAFOSO AG, Liebefeld, Switzerland.
Isabel LechnerSAFOSO AG, Liebefeld, Switzerland.
Manon SchuppersSAFOSO AG, Liebefeld, Switzerland.
Kyiv Institute of Traditional Medicine · UANational Scientific Center "Institute of Experimental and Clinical Veterinary Medicine" · UASafoso (Switzerland) · CHFlorida Department of Health · USNational University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine · UAUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) questionnaire was designed to collect information on farmers' knowledge of ASF and their practices surrounding that could impact the spread of the disease. The questionnaire was distributed, and data collected, from 233 backyard farmers from five selected Oblasts (Rivne, Kharkiv, Odessa, Zakarpattia and Kiev). Kruskal-Wallis tests were conducted to identify factors that could influence knowledge, and Dunn tests were performed to determine differences between groups when the Kruskal-Wallis tests were significant. Spearman tests were carried out to explore the association between knowledge and risky practices. Results show that comprehensive knowledge on ASF is not common in backyard farmers and that risky practices that influence the spread of ASF are regularly performed. Of the respondents, 47% felt well-informed about how ASF can be transmitted and 31.8% felt confident about recognizing clinical signs of ASF. The independent variable "Oblast" was identified as a significant factor (p = 0.0015) associated with differences in knowledge on clinical signs. We demonstrated statistically significant differences of knowledge between backyard farmers from different Oblasts. Knowledge of preventive measures was positively correlated with risky handling practices related to edible pork products (p = 0.0053) and non-edible pork products (p = 0.0417). In conclusion, our results show that backyard farmers have knowledge gaps on ASF and practice various risky behaviours that might favour the spread of the disease in Ukraine. There are regional differences in ASF knowledge and risky practices that should be taken into consideration in future evidence-based ASF prevention and control programs, including public awareness activities.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverSwine DiseasesAnimal HusbandryAnimalsFarmersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesSwineUkraineASFattitudes and practicesbackyard farmerknowledgeUkraine

Identifiers

PMID34327865
PMCPMC8464288
OpenAlexW3185843029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.