Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34327816›Full record

ArticleActa ophthalmologica2022

Disease expression caused by different variants in the BEST1 gene: genotype and phenotype findings in bestrophinopathies.

Katarzyna Nowomiejska, Fadi Nasser, Katarina Stingl, Simone Schimpf-Linzenbold, Saskia Biskup, Agnieszka Brzozowska, Robert Rejdak, Susanne Kohl, Eberhart Zrenner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review of the clinical electrooculogram - Part 1: Mechanism of the Light-Rise.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katarzyna NowomiejskaChair and Department of General and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5805-8761
Fadi NasserInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5309-7155
Katarina StinglUniversity Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Simone Schimpf-LinzenboldPraxis für Humangenetik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Saskia BiskupPraxis für Humangenetik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Agnieszka BrzozowskaDepartment of Mathematics and Medical Biostatistics, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Robert RejdakChair and Department of General and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3321-2723
Susanne KohlInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Eberhart ZrennerInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
STZ eyetrial · DEMedical University of Lublin · PLPraxis für Humangenetik Tübingen · DE

Funding

Therapeutic gene editing and multimodal imaging in juvenile macular degeneration R24EY028758 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI AUDO , ISABELLE, SPARROW, JANET RUTHE · 2020 to 2024
$10.9M
NEI NIH HHS R24 EY028758Tistou and Charlotte Kerstan Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyse the spectrum of clinical features and molecular genetic data in a series of patients carrying likely disease-associated variants in the BEST1 gene.

methodsRetrospective observational analysis of clinical data extracted from the medical records of visual function, multimodal imaging and electrophysiology of 62 eyes of 31 patients. Molecular genetic analysis was performed by means of panel-based NGS or Sanger sequencing.

resultsThe spectrum of variants in the BEST1 gene comprised 19 different variants and three of which are novel. Fundus photographs and OCT images allowed categorization of 52 eyes as Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) with stages 1 to 5 and 10 eyes with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB), with more severe phenotype. One patient was shown to be heterozygous for a variant, which has so far been described only in ARB, but this patient had the BVMD phenotype. There was no significant progression of the visual acuity during the follow-up period of 5 years both in BVMD and ARB. The most prevalent pattern of fundus autofluorescence (FAF) in BVMD was 'patchy'. There were diverse visual field defects in static automated perimetry (SAP) depending on the stage. The Arden ratio was significantly lower in ARB patients and in eyes with stage 5 of BVMD.

conclusionsThe genotype does not always predict the phenotype in patients with BVMD and ARB; however, having two mutations in the BEST1 gene causes a more severe phenotype. FAF helped to distinguish ARB from BVMD. Most of the observed eyes did not progress functionally during the follow-up. ARB and the atrophic stage of BVMD as the disease end-stage had the worst visual functions and EOG results.

Indexed as

BestrophinsRetinal DiseasesVitelliform Macular DystrophyGenotypeHumansMutationPedigreePhenotypeRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceBEST1 protein, humanBestrophinsautosomal dominant bestrophinopathybest vitelliform macular dystrophygenotypephenotype

Identifiers

PMID34327816
PMCPMC9328113
OpenAlexW3186504622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.