Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34327652›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022

"I was not able to keep myself away from tending to her immediate needs": Primary Care Physicians' Perspectives of Serious Illness Conversations at Community Health Centers.

Deborah Swiderski, Annette Georgia, Elizabeth Chuang, Allison Stark, Justin Sanders, Anna Flattau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Patient Identification for Serious Illness Conversations: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deborah SwiderskiDepartment of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. dswiders@montefiore.org.ORCID 0000-0002-6790-8166
Annette GeorgiaNYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Elizabeth ChuangDepartment of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Allison StarkDepartment of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Justin SandersSerious Illness Care Program, Ariadne Labs, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Anna FlattauDepartment of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

Funding

CTSA Administrative Supplement for Informatics Core: A novel AI/ML system to predict respiratory failure and ARDS in Covid-19 patientsUL1TR002556 · NCATS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI KELLER, MARLA J, KIM, MIMI Y · 2018 to 2022
$26.7M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002558 · NCATS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI MARANTZ, PAUL R · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002558NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR002558-03NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002556
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSeriously ill patients in low-income and minority populations have lower rates of advance care planning. Initiatives that promote serious illness (SI) conversations in community health centers (CHCs) can reach broad, diverse patient populations. This qualitative study explored the experiences of primary care physicians in conducting SI conversations at CHCs in order to understand challenges and needs in this setting.

methodsAn initiative to increase SI conversations was implemented at two CHCs in the Bronx, NY. Eleven participating family physicians who together conducted 37 SI conversations underwent semi-structured in-depth interviews. The 11 interviews were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

resultsEight themes emerged: (1) Structured approaches to SI conversations are useful even in longstanding patient-doctor relationships; (2) Discussion of prognosis is meaningful but difficult; (3) Emotional work is humanizing but draining; (4) Poverty and underinsurance are high priorities; (5) Social context affects patient readiness; (6) Communication barriers take multiple forms; (7) Patient characteristics make it "easier" or "harder" to initiate the SI conversation; (8) Time constraints limit the ability to meet multiple patient needs.

conclusionsPhysicians at CHCs identified challenges in SI conversations at personal, interpersonal, organizational, and societal levels. These challenges should be addressed by initiatives that aim to increase SI conversations in primary care, and especially at CHCs.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningPhysicians, Primary CareCommunicationCommunity Health CentersFemaleHumansPhysician-Patient Relationsadvance care planningcommunity health centershealth communicationprimary carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID34327652
PMCPMC8738823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.