ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021
Clinical and radiological outcomes of endoscopic foraminoplasty and decompression assisted with preoperative planning software for lumbar foraminal stenosis.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Visualized Foraminoplasty and Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation with Bilateral Radiculopathy.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- SPINE: High heterogeneity and no significant differences in clinical outcomes of endoscopic foraminotomy vs fusion for lumbar foraminal stenosis: a meta-analysis.EFORT open reviews · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of using endoscopic foraminoplasty and decompression assisted with a preoperative planning software in the treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis.
methodsThis retrospective study included 43 patients with lumbar foraminal stenosis (Jan 2018 and June 2019). These patients were divided into two groups. Patients in the conventional group (group A) underwent endoscopic lumbar foraminoplasty and decompression. Patients in the experimental group (group B) underwent the same surgery assisted with a preoperative software. The total operation time, puncture-channel establishment time, and the number of intraoperative fluoroscopic images taken were recorded. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were administered preoperatively and postoperatively (at 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month follow-up). The modified MacNab criteria were used to assess the global outcome at 12-month follow-up.
resultsPatients in group B had shorter operation time, puncture-channel establishment time, and less number of intraoperative fluoroscopic images taken, as compared with group A. The VAS and ODI scores were significantly lower than pre-operation for both groups at all follow-ups. No significant difference was observed between these two groups. Based on the modified MacNab criteria, the excellent-to-good rate was 86.4% in group A and 90.5% in group B, respectively. After the operation, no patients had residual osteophytes in group B, while two patients still had residual osteophytes and foraminal stenosis in group A.
conclusionFor endoscopic surgery treating lumbar foraminal stenosis, using preoperative planning software could reduce the puncture-channel establishment time, operation time, and the number of intraoperative fluoroscopic images taken without affecting the clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.