Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34327625›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2021

Anatomic Point-Based Lung Region with Zone Identification for Radiologist Annotation and Machine Learning for Chest Radiographs.

Feng Li, Samuel G Armato, Roger Engelmann, Thomas Rhines, Jennie Crosby, Li Lan, Maryellen L Giger, Heber MacMahon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Feng LiDepartment of Radiology, MC-2026, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. feng@uchicago.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8302-6174
Samuel G ArmatoDepartment of Radiology, MC-2026, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Roger EngelmannDepartment of Radiology, MC-2026, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Thomas RhinesDepartment of Radiology, MC-2026, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Jennie CrosbyDepartment of Radiology, MC-2026, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Li LanDepartment of Radiology, MC-2026, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Maryellen L GigerDepartment of Radiology, MC-2026, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Heber MacMahonDepartment of Radiology, MC-2026, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our objective is to investigate the reliability and usefulness of anatomic point-based lung zone segmentation on chest radiographs (CXRs) as a reference standard framework and to evaluate the accuracy of automated point placement. Two hundred frontal CXRs were presented to two radiologists who identified five anatomic points: two at the lung apices, one at the top of the aortic arch, and two at the costophrenic angles. Of these 1000 anatomic points, 161 (16.1%) were obscured (mostly by pleural effusions). Observer variations were investigated. Eight anatomic zones then were automatically generated from the manually placed anatomic points, and a prototype algorithm was developed using the point-based lung zone segmentation to detect cardiomegaly and levels of diaphragm and pleural effusions. A trained U-Net neural network was used to automatically place these five points within 379 CXRs of an independent database. Intra- and inter-observer variation in mean distance between corresponding anatomic points was larger for obscured points (8.7 mm and 20 mm, respectively) than for visible points (4.3 mm and 7.6 mm, respectively). The computer algorithm using the point-based lung zone segmentation could diagnostically measure the cardiothoracic ratio and diaphragm position or pleural effusion. The mean distance between corresponding points placed by the radiologist and by the neural network was 6.2 mm. The network identified 95% of the radiologist-indicated points with only 3% of network-identified points being false-positives. In conclusion, a reliable anatomic point-based lung segmentation method for CXRs has been developed with expected utility for establishing reference standards for machine learning applications.

Indexed as

LungRadiography, ThoracicHumansMachine LearningRadiologistsReproducibility of ResultsAnatomic PointsChest RadiographyPoint-Based Lung Zone SegmentationReference StandardU-Net Neural Network

Identifiers

PMID34327625
PMCPMC8455736
OpenAlexW3186596252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.