Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34327580›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

MRI radiomics features of mesorectal fat can predict response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and tumor recurrence in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam, Viktoriya Paroder, Peter Gibbs, Raazi Bajwa, Natalie Gangai, Ramon E Sosa, Iva Petkovska, Jennifer S Golia Pernicka, James Louis Fuqua, David D B Bates and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam *Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Viktoriya Paroder *Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA. paroderv@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4356-8256
Peter GibbsDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Raazi BajwaDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Natalie GangaiDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Ramon E SosaDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Iva PetkovskaDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Jennifer S Golia PernickaDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
James Louis FuquaDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
David D B BatesDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Martin R WeiserColorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Andrea CercekDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Marc J GollubDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo interrogate the mesorectal fat using MRI radiomics feature analysis in order to predict clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

methodsThis retrospective study included patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer from 2009 to 2015. Three radiologists independently segmented mesorectal fat on baseline T2-weighted axial MRI. Radiomics features were extracted from segmented volumes and calculated using CERR software, with adaptive synthetic sampling being employed to combat large class imbalances. Outcome variables included pathologic complete response (pCR), local recurrence, distant recurrence, clinical T-category (cT), post-treatment T category (ypT), and post-treatment N category (ypN). A maximum of eight most important features were selected for model development using support vector machines and fivefold cross-validation to predict each outcome parameter via elastic net regularization. Diagnostic metrics of the final models were calculated, including sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and AUC.

resultsThe study included 236 patients (54 ± 12 years, 135 men). The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for each clinical outcome were as follows: for pCR, 0.89, 78.0%, 85.1%, 52.5%, 94.9%, 83.9%; for local recurrence, 0.79, 68.3%, 80.7%, 46.7%, 91.2%, 78.3%; for distant recurrence, 0.87, 80.0%, 88.4%, 58.3%, 95.6%, 87.0%; for cT, 0.80, 85.8%, 56.5%, 89.1%, 49.1%, 80.1%; for ypN, 0.74, 65.0%, 80.1%, 52.7%, 87.0%, 76.3%; and for ypT, 0.86, 81.3%, 84.2%, 96.4%, 46.4%, 81.8%.

conclusionRadiomics features of mesorectal fat can predict pathological complete response and local and distant recurrence, as well as post-treatment T and N categories. KEY POINTS: • Mesorectal fat contains important prognostic information in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). • Radiomics features of mesorectal fat were significantly different between those who achieved complete vs incomplete pathologic response (accuracy 83.9%, 95% CI: 78.6-88.4%). • Radiomics features of mesorectal fat were significantly different between those who did vs did not develop local or distant recurrence (accuracy 78.3%, 95% CI: 72.0-83.7% and 87.0%, 95% CI: 81.6-91.2% respectively).

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdipose tissueMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant therapyRectal neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID34327580
PMCPMC9018044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.