Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34327575›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

CT-based thermometry with virtual monoenergetic images by dual-energy of fat, muscle and bone using FBP, iterative and deep learning-based reconstruction.

Andreas Heinrich, Sebastian Schenkl, David Buckreus, Felix V Güttler, Ulf K-M Teichgräber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Dual-Energy CT in Oncologic Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Systematic Review on Learning-based Spectral CT.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andreas HeinrichDepartment of Radiology, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. andreas.heinrich@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3862-4543
Sebastian SchenklInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
David BuckreusDepartment of Radiology, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Felix V GüttlerDepartment of Radiology, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Ulf K-M TeichgräberDepartment of Radiology, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of CT-based thermometry for clinical applications regarding a three-component tissue phantom of fat, muscle and bone. Virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) by dual-energy measurements and conventional polychromatic 120-kVp images with modern reconstruction algorithms adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Volume (ASIR-V) and deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) were compared.

methodsA temperature-regulating water circuit system was developed for the systematic evaluation of the correlation between temperature and Hounsfield units (HU). The measurements were performed on a Revolution CT with gemstone spectral imaging technology (GSI). Complementary measurements were performed without GSI (voltage 120 kVp, current 130-545 mA). The measured object was a tissue equivalent phantom in a temperature range of 18 to 50°C. The evaluation was carried out for VMI at 40 to 140 keV and polychromatic 120-kVp images.

resultsThe regression analysis showed a significant inverse linear dependency between temperature and average HU regardless of ASIR-V and DLIR. VMI show a higher temperature sensitivity compared to polychromatic images. The temperature sensitivities were 1.25 HU/°C (120 kVp) and 1.35 HU/°C (VMI at 140 keV) for fat, 0.38 HU/°C (120 kVp) and 0.47 HU/°C (VMI at 40 keV) for muscle and 1.15 HU/°C (120 kVp) and 3.58 HU/°C (VMI at 50 keV) for bone.

conclusionsDual-energy with VMI enables a higher temperature sensitivity for fat, muscle and bone. The reconstruction with ASIR-V and DLIR has no significant influence on CT-based thermometry, which opens up the potential of drastic dose reductions. KEY POINTS: • Virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) enable a higher temperature sensitivity for fat (8%), muscle (24%) and bone (211%) compared to conventional polychromatic 120-kVp images. • With VMI, there are parameters, e.g. monoenergy and reconstruction kernel, to modulate the temperature sensitivity. In contrast, there are no parameters to influence the temperature sensitivity for conventional polychromatic 120-kVp images. • The application of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Volume (ASIR-V) and deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) has no effect on CT-based thermometry, opening up the potential of drastic dose reductions in clinical applications.

Indexed as

Deep LearningThermometryAlgorithmsHumansMusclesRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesSignal-To-Noise RatioTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomographyDeep learningDual-energy scanned projectionThermometry

Identifiers

PMID34327575
PMCPMC8660750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.