Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34327547›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

Jun Liang Teh, Hui Yu Tham, Alex Yu Sen Soh, Corrisa Chee, Guowei Kim, Asim Shabbir, Reuben Kong Min Wong, Jimmy Bok Yan So

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Standard length of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. POEMtic Justice: Manageable Post-procedural Reflux.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jun Liang TehDepartment of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Level 8 Tower Block, 1 E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119 228, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4513-0824
Hui Yu ThamDepartment of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Level 8 Tower Block, 1 E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119 228, Singapore.
Alex Yu Sen SohDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medicine Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Corrisa CheeDepartment of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Level 8 Tower Block, 1 E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119 228, Singapore.
Guowei KimDepartment of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Level 8 Tower Block, 1 E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119 228, Singapore.
Asim ShabbirDepartment of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Level 8 Tower Block, 1 E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119 228, Singapore.
Reuben Kong Min WongDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jimmy Bok Yan SoDepartment of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Level 8 Tower Block, 1 E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119 228, Singapore. jimmy_so@nuhs.edu.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is gaining traction as a minimally invasive treatment of achalasia. Increased reflux is reported after POEM but the incidence, type and severity of reflux are not fully understood. We aimed to study the prevalence and nature of reflux after POEM and correlate reflux with endoscopy and pH-impedance findings.

methodsThis is a prospective cohort study of achalasia patients undergoing POEM since 2014. Data from Eckardt and GERD symptom scores, high-resolution oesophageal manometry (HRM) and gastroscopy were performed pre-procedure and repeated at 1-year follow-up. Data from 24-h pH-impedance, if performed, were also recorded. A standardized questionnaire was used to determine the severity and frequency of heartburn symptoms and the composite score for each patient was calculated.

results58 patients underwent POEM between January 2014 and October 2018. The efficacy of POEM at 1 year was 93.0%. We observed reduction of median Integrated Relaxation Pressure (IRP) from 23.5 ± 33.1 mmHg to 13.4 ± 7.71 mmHg (p = 0.005) and mean Eckardt score improved from 6.09 ± 2.43 points to 1.16 ± 1.70 points (p < 0.001). At 1 year, 43.1% (n = 25) had symptomatic reflux. Of the 40 patients who underwent repeated gastroscopy, 60.0% (n = 24) had endoscopic evidence of oesophagitis with seven patients (18%) diagnosed with Grade C or D oesophagitis. 43.1% (n = 25) of patients had pH-impedance done post-POEM off PPIs. 14 patients (56%) had increased acid exposure. Sixteen percent of reflux episodes were acidic and 77.3% were weakly acidic.

conclusionPOEM was an effective treatment for achalasia. However, GERD was common after POEM with incidence of 43% on symptom score, 60% on endoscopy and 56% on pH-impedance test. Post-POEM reflux appeared to be predominantly acidic in nature. Routine surveillance for GERD after POEM is recommended.

Indexed as

Esophageal AchalasiaEsophagitis, PepticGastroesophageal RefluxMyotomyNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryEsophageal Sphincter, LowerEsophagoscopyHumansProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEsophagitisGERDpH-impedencePOEMReflux

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.