Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34327520›Full record

ArticleVirtual, augmented and mixed reality : industrial and everyday life applications : 12th International Conference, VAMR 2020, held as part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19-24, 2020, Procee...2020

Development and Human Factors Considerations for Extended Reality Applications in Medicine: The Enhanced ELectrophysiology Visualization and Interaction System (ĒLVIS).

Jennifer N Avari Silva, Mary Beth Privitera, Michael K Southworth, Jonathan R Silva

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virtual, augmented and mixed reality : industrial and everyday life applications : 12th International Conference, VAMR 2020, held as part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19-24, 2020, Procee..., 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Extended reality in cardiovascular care: a systematic review.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Extended reality for biomedicine.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Design Considerations for Interacting and Navigating with 2 Dimensional and 3 Dimensional Medical Images in Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality Medical Applications.Virtual, augmented and mixed reality : 13th International Conference, VAMR 2021, held as part of the 23rd HCI International Conference, HCII 2021, Virtual event, July 24-29, 2021, Proceedings. VAMR (Conference) (13th : 2021 : Online) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Registration Techniques for Clinical Applications of Three-Dimensional Augmented Reality Devices.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer N Avari SilvaDepartment of Pediatrics, Cardiology. Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0001-5295-1893
Mary Beth PriviteraHS Design, Gladstone, NJ.ORCID 0000-0002-9958-109X
Michael K SouthworthSentiAR, Inc, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0001-7510-112X
Jonathan R SilvaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering. Washington University in St Louis, McKelvey School of Engineering, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0002-3696-3955
Washington University in St. Louis · USGladstone Institutes · USSentient Science (United States) · US

Funding

Using Augmented Reality To Make Cardiac Ablation Procedures Simpler and SaferR44HL140896 · NHLBI · SENTIAR, INC. · PI SILVA, JENNIFER N, SILVA, JONATHAN R · 2018 to 2019
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R44 HL140896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid expansion of hardware options in the extended realities (XRs), there has been widespread development of applications throughout many fields, including engineering, entertainment and medicine. Development of medical applications for the XRs have a unique set of considerations during development and human factors testing. Additionally, understanding the constraints of the user and the use case allow for iterative improvement. In this manuscript, the authors discuss the considerations when developing and performing human factors testing for XR applications, using the Enhanced ELectrophysiology Visualization and Interaction System (ĒLVIS) as an example. Additionally, usability and critical interpersonal interaction data from first-in-human testing of ĒLVIS are presented.

Indexed as

Ablation AccuracyCardiac ElectrophysiologyExtended RealityMedical ApplicationsMixed Reality

Identifiers

PMID34327520
PMCPMC8317914
OpenAlexW3041535226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.