Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34327501›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2021

Thirty percent of children and young adults with familial hypercholesterolemia treated with statins have adherence issues.

Gisle Langslet, Anja K Johansen, Martin P Bogsrud, Ingunn Narverud, Hilde Risstad, Kjetil Retterstøl, Kirsten B Holven

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Diagnosis of Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Children and Young Adults.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Sex Differences in Familial Hypercholesterolemia.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gisle LangsletLipid Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Aker Sykehus, P.O. Box 4959 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Anja K JohansenDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1046 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway.
Martin P BogsrudNorwegian National Advisory Unit on Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ingunn NarverudDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1046 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway.
Hilde RisstadLipid Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Aker Sykehus, P.O. Box 4959 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Kjetil RetterstølLipid Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Aker Sykehus, P.O. Box 4959 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Kirsten B HolvenDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1046 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess adherence to lipid lowering therapy (LLT), reasons for poor adherence, and achievement of LDL-C treatment goals in children and young adults with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).

methodsRetrospective review of the medical records of 438 children that started follow-up at the Lipid Clinic, Oslo University hospital, between 1990 and 2010, and followed-up to the end of July 2019. Based on information on adherence to the LLT at the latest visit, patients were assigned to "good adherence" or "poor adherence" groups. Reasons for poor adherence were categorized as: "lack of motivation", "ran out of drugs", or "side effects".

resultsThree hundred and seventy-one patients were included. Mean (SD) age and follow-up time at the latest visit was 24.0 (7.1) and 12.9 (6.7) years; 260 patients (70%, 95% CI: 65-74%) had "good adherence" and 111 (30%, 95% CI: 25-35%) had "poor adherence". "Lack of motivation" was the most common reason for poor adherence (

conclusionThirty percent of young patients with FH had poor adherence to LLT, with lack of motivation as the main reason. Higher age, more visits and more years of follow-up were associated with good adherence.

Indexed as

AdherenceChildrenFamilial hypercholesterolemiaStatinsYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID34327501
PMCPMC8315460
OpenAlexW3145575505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.