ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2020
The role of traditional risk factors in explaining the social disparities in cardiovascular death: The national health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES III).
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lack of relationship between posttraumatic stress disorder and coronary atherosclerotic burden among twin veterans from the Vietnam era.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- The association between social drivers of health, HIV status and physical activity with perceived stress in U.S. women with or without HIV.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The portfolio dietary pattern and risk of cardiovascular disease mortality during 1988-2019 in US adults: a prospective cohort study.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Associations of healthy lifestyle and family income to poverty ratio with all-cause mortality among people with prediabetes and diabetes: a prospective cohort study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Association Between Family Income, Subclinical Myocardial Injury, and Cardiovascular Mortality in the General Population.Clinical cardiology · 2024Article
- Social Risk and Clinical Outcomes Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- The prognostic role of diet quality in patients with MAFLD and physical activity: data from NHANES.Nutrition & diabetes · 2024Article
- The burden of premature coronary heart disease among adults with low socioeconomic status in Argentina: A modeling study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Family income and cardiovascular disease risk in American adults.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Social and clinical risk factors associated with hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Brussels's deprived and multiethnic areas.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Does education modify the association between depression and cardiovascular health? (from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey, 2013-14 and 2015-16).American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objective─ To assess the role of traditional risk factors in explaining the association between cumulative social risk exposure and disparities in CVD death among US adults.
methods─ The study included 15,906 participants from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III who were CVD-free at enrollment. Baseline social risk factors (minority race, poverty-income ratio<1, education<12 grade, and living single) were used to create a cumulative social risk score (0 to ≥3). CVD death served as the primary outcome. We assessed the contribution of each major CVD risk factor to the link between cumulative social risk exposure and CVD death.
results─ During a median follow-up of 14 years, 1309 CVD deaths occurred. Participants with elevated cumulative social risk score were at increased risk of CVD death, with hazard ratio 1.19(95%CI 1.01-1.41), 1.52(95%CI 1.28-1.79), and 1.46 (95%CI 1.23-1.74) in individuals with score 1, 2 and ≥ 3 respectively, compared with individuals with score of 0. Traditional CVD risk factors explained about one third of the disparities in CVD death in individuals with the elevated social risk exposure. Among the one third effect by combined CVD risk factors, current smoking contributed the largest proportion, accounting for approximately one half of the combined risk factors effect, followed by obesity and diabetes.
conclusions─Among the traditional risk factors, control of smoking appears to be the greatest opportunity to attenuate the social disparities in CVD death. While these findings call for further studies to identify other pathways that explain the elevated CVD mortality in socially disadvantaged population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.