ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2020
Estimated ASCVD risk according to statin use in US adults with borderline triglycerides: Results from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2014.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- US Trends in Cholesterol Screening, Lipid Levels, and Lipid-Lowering Medication Use in US Adults, 1999 to 2018.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElevated triglycerides (TGs) are associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Despite statin therapy, many US adults have borderline or elevated TG levels. Not characterized is the ASCVD risk associated with borderline TG levels in statin users, including the estimated number of adults who will sustain ASCVD events.
methodsWe studied 4986 US adults (weighted to 113 million) aged 40-74 from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2007-2014. The proportion of persons at low (<5%), borderline (5-<7.5%), intermediate (7.5-<20%), and high (≥20%) 10-year ASCVD risk among those on statins was quantified for low (<70 mg/dL, 70-<100 mg/dL), borderline (100-<135 mg/dL and 135-<150 mg/dL), borderline high (150-<200 mg/dL), and elevated (≥200 mg/dL) TGs. Multiple logistic regression examined these TG categories in relation to high risk status.
resultsOverall, 18.6% of participants had TG < 70 mg/dL, 24.2% TG 70-<100 mg/dL, 22.0% TG 100-<135 mg/dL, 6.2% TG 135-<150 mg/dL, 15.0% TG 150-<200 mg/dL, and 14.0% TG ≥ 200 mg/dL. Mean 10-year ASCVD risk for these groups were 5.6%, 6.9%, 7.8%, 10.3%, 9.6% and 10.8%, respectively (p < 0.0001). One-fifth or more of statin users with TGs over 135 mg/dL were at ≥ 20% 10-year ASCVD risk and ≥60% of persons in all TG groups were at borderline or higher ASCVD risk. Compared to those with TGs <70 mg/dL, multiple logistic regression showed odds ratios of 3.1 to 4.6 (p < 0.05 to p < 0.01) for those in TG groups ≥135 mg/dL in the overall sample, but 3.4 to 8.1 (p < 0.05 to p < 0.01) for those in TG groups of ≥100 mg/dL in statin users, despite adjustment including HDL-C.
conclusionMany US adults with borderline levels of TGs are at elevated ASCVD risk despite statin therapy, suggesting the need first for greater lifestyle modification efforts, and when indicated, evidence-based therapies known to reduce this residual ASCVD risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.