Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34327398›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2020

Psychotropic medication utilisation in adult cancer patients in China: A cross-sectional study based on national health insurance database.

Lin Bai, Ziyue Xu, Cong Huang, Yunchuan Sui, Xiaodong Guan, Luwen Shi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prescription and use of psychoactive medications among cancer patients and associated factors in lower and upper middle-income countries: systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Psychotropic medication use in cancer patients- a Chinese perspective.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lin BaiDepartment of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Ziyue XuDepartment of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Cong HuangDepartment of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Yunchuan SuiDepartment of Psychiatry, No. 904th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistics Support Force, Changzhou 213000, China.
Xiaodong GuanDepartment of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Luwen ShiDepartment of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Peking University · CN81th Hospital of PLA · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychotropic medications are useful to treat psychiatric disorders which are frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated in cancer patients. Evidence on utilisation of psychotropic medications in cancer patients was absent in China. This study aimed to analyse the prevalence and the potential predictors of psychotropic medication use in adult cancer patients in China.

methodsWe analysed cross-sectional data from the China Health Insurance Association database in 2015-2017, which contained health care utilisation information for a national representative sample of basic medical insurance beneficiaries. Cancer patients aged above 18 were identified by International Classification of Disease 10th revision code C00-C97. Psychotropic medications were defined following the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes: antipsychotics (N05A), anxiolytics (N05B), hypnotics and sedatives (N05C), and antidepressants (N06A, N06CA). We calculated the prevalence of psychotropic medication use in cancer patients, and applied multivariable logistic regression to identify its potential predictors.

findingsA total of 260,364 adults with cancer were identified in the database, of which 48,111 (18•5%) were prescribed at least one psychotropic medication comprising antipsychotics (3763, 1•4%), anxiolytics (15,902, 6•1%), hypnotics and sedatives (37,040, 14•2%), and antidepressants (2379, 0•9%). Patients with solid tumours had higher prevalence of psychotropic medication use than patients with lymphoid and hematopoietic malignancies (e.g. female genital organs, adjusted odds ratio (OR)=2•25, 95%CI=2•09-2•44). The prevalence of psychotropic medication use in cancer patients in the Eastern region was significantly higher than those of cancer patients in the Western regions (OR=2•33, 95%CI=2•27-2•40). Compared with the Urban Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance beneficiaries, cancer patients covered by the Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance were more likely to use psychotropic medications (OR=1•18, 95%CI=1•15-1•20). Midazolam was the most frequently used psychotropic (21,728, 45•2%), and flupentixol-melitracen was the most commonly used antidepressant (1176, 2•4%) among all psychotropic medication users in the sample.

interpretationThe prevalence of psychotropic medication use in Chinese adult cancer patients was inequitable. Further attention will be needed to be paid to the mental health of cancer patients in China.

fundingNo funding.

Indexed as

Cancer patientChinaDrug utilisationPsychotropic medication

Identifiers

PMID34327398
PMCPMC8315446
OpenAlexW3102986986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.