Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34327344›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2021

Effectiveness and safety of iguratimod treatment in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis in Chinese: A nationwide, prospective real-world study.

Rong Mu, Chun Li, Xiaomei Li, Yao Ke, Ling Zhao, Lin Chen, Rui Wu, Zhenbiao Wu, Xiaoxia Zuo, Yanli Xie and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01554917 (A Phase IV Study of Iguratimod in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01554917 phase4completednot on this map

A Phase IV Study of Iguratimod in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorJiangsu Simcere Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Ran2012 to 2015Enrolled1,759ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsIguratimod
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Rong MuDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, China.
Chun LiDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, China.
Xiaomei LiDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, No.17 Lujiang Road, Hefei, China.
Yao KeDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, China.
Ling ZhaoDepartment of Rheumatological Immunology, First Hospital, Jilin University, 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, China.
Lin ChenDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Jilin Provincial People's Hospital, 1183 Industrial and Agricultural Road, Changchun, China.
Rui WuDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University, No.17 Yongwai main street, Nanchang, China.
Zhenbiao WuDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No.127 Changle west road, Xi'an, China.
Xiaoxia ZuoDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yanli XieDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jinwei ChenDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No.139 Ren Min Middle Road, Changsha, China.
Wei WeiDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Street, Tianjin, China.
Yi LiuDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, West China Hospital, No.37 Guoxue Lane, Chengdu, China.
Zhijun LiDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, First Affiliated Hospital, Bengbu Medical College, 287 Changhuai Road, Bengbu, China.
Lie DaiDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, 107 Yan Jiang West Road, Guangzhou, China.
Lingyun SunDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Nanjing University Medical School, NO.321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, China.
Xiangyuan LiuDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Garden Road, Beijing, China.
Zhanguo LiDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNCentral South University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNJilin University · CNNanchang University · CNNanjing Medical University · CNPeople 's Hospital of Jilin Province · CNSichuan University · CNTianjin Medical University General Hospital · CNUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CNXijing Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is heterogeneity in the clinical manifestations and responses to drugs in RA patients due to variety of factors such as genes and environment. Despite advances in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), approximately 40% of RA patients still do not achieve primary clinical outcomes in randomized trials, and its low remission rate and high economic consumption remain unresolved, especially in developing countries. Iguratimod (IGU) is a new disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) with a low price that has demonstrated good efficacy and safety in clinical trials and was approved for active RA in China and Japan. As the most populous country in the Western Pacific region, it is warranted to conduct a study with a large scale of patients in a real-life setting. Our study confirms the new option for RA patients, which is potentially benificial for public health in developing countries.

methodsThis was a nationwide, prospective real-world study of IGU. Eligible subjects were active adult RA patients who aged 18 to 85 with or without multiple comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes with DMARDs at a stable dosage for at least 12 weeks, or without ongoing DMARDs. A two-stage design was used for this study. In the first stage (the first 12 weeks), IGU 25 mg bid was added as monotherapy or to the background therapy, and in the second stage (the latter 12 weeks), adjustment of RA medicines other than IGU was allowed according to the participants' disease activity. The primary endpoints were American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20) 24 weeks and adverse events during 24 weeks. The secondary endpoints were ACR50 and ACR70 over 24 weeks, the changes of DAS28 and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at week 12 and week 24 from baseline. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01554917.

findingsBetween March 2012 and January 2015, 1759 participants were enrolled, of whom 81•5% (1433/1759) completed the study. Notably, 1597 patients in the full analysis set were assessed for the effectiveness and 1751 patients were in the safety analysis set; 71•9% (1148/1597) of the patients achieved the primary endpoint of ACR20 response at week 24, and 51•7% (906/1751) patients had at least 1 adverse event (AE). The incidence of the clinical significant AE (grade≥3) of special interest was 3•4% (54 patients for grade 3 and 6 patients for grade 4), and 0•7% (13/1751) of patients developed SAEs associated with IGU. The most common clinical significant AEs were infection in 0•6% (10/1751) of the patients, abdominal discomfort in 0•5% (9/1751) of the patients including 0•2% (3/1751) gastric ulcer, fracture in 0•4% (7/1751), and increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in 0•2% (3/1751) of the patients. The secondary endpoint of ACR50 and ACR70 response rates at week 24 were 47•4% (757/1597) and 24•0% (384/1597). DAS28 was 4•11±1•27 and 3•75±1•32 at week 12 and 24, which was significantly decreased -1•40±1•10 and -1•75±1•26 compared with baseline (

interpretationOur results confirmed the effectiveness and safety of IGU as a new DMARD for active patients with RA as monotherapy or combination therapy.

fundingThis study was supported by "the 11th Five-Year-Plan for Science and Technology Support Program (2012ZX09104-103-01)".

Identifiers

PMID34327344
PMCPMC8315426
OpenAlexW3137584732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.