Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34327333›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2020

Age-Related Differences in Auditory Cortex Activity During Spoken Word Recognition.

Chad S Rogers, Michael S Jones, Sarah McConkey, Brent Spehar, Kristin J Van Engen, Mitchell S Sommers, Jonathan E Peelle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chad S RogersDepartment of Psychology, Union College, Schenectady, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4845-7128
Michael S JonesDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4311-1347
Sarah McConkeyDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0138-9439
Brent SpeharDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8300-1118
Kristin J Van EngenDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9069-5464
Mitchell S SommersDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jonathan E PeelleDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9194-854X

Funding

THE NEUROCOGNITIVE BASIS OF EFFORTFUL LISTENING - Administrative supplement for Alzheimer's DiseaseR01DC014281 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PEELLE, JONATHAN E · 2015 to 2019
$3.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding spoken words requires the rapid matching of a complex acoustic stimulus with stored lexical representations. The degree to which brain networks supporting spoken word recognition are affected by adult aging remains poorly understood. In the current study we used fMRI to measure the brain responses to spoken words in two conditions: an attentive listening condition, in which no response was required, and a repetition task. Listeners were 29 young adults (aged 19-30 years) and 32 older adults (aged 65-81 years) without self-reported hearing difficulty. We found largely similar patterns of activity during word perception for both young and older adults, centered on the bilateral superior temporal gyrus. As expected, the repetition condition resulted in significantly more activity in areas related to motor planning and execution (including the premotor cortex and supplemental motor area) compared to the attentive listening condition. Importantly, however, older adults showed significantly less activity in probabilistically defined auditory cortex than young adults when listening to individual words in both the attentive listening and repetition tasks. Age differences in auditory cortex activity were seen selectively for words (no age differences were present for 1-channel vocoded speech, used as a control condition), and could not be easily explained by accuracy on the task, movement in the scanner, or hearing sensitivity (available on a subset of participants). These findings indicate largely similar patterns of brain activity for young and older adults when listening to words in quiet, but suggest less recruitment of auditory cortex by the older adults.

Indexed as

cognitive agingspeech perceptionspeech production

Identifiers

PMID34327333
PMCPMC8318202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.