Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34327330›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2021

Careful feature selection is key in classification of Alzheimer's disease patients based on whole-genome sequencing data.

Marlena Osipowicz, Bartek Wilczynski, Magdalena A Machnicka, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetic risk in Alzheimer's disease.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marlena OsipowiczInstitute of Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Mechanics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, 02-097, Poland.
Bartek WilczynskiInstitute of Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Mechanics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, 02-097, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8134-0589
Magdalena A MachnickaInstitute of Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Mechanics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, 02-097, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2257-2961
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
SUPPLEMENT TO RUSH ALZHEIMERS DISEASE CENTER COREP30AG010161 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LEURGANS, SUE E. · 1991 to 2020
$49.1M
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF NEURAL RESERVE AND NEUROBIOLOGY IN AGINGR01AG017917 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BENNETT, DAVID ALAN · 2001 to 2023
$43.3M
RISK FACTORS, PATHOLOGY, AND CLINICAL EXPRESSIONS OF ADR01AG015819 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BENNETT, DAVID ALAN · 1998 to 2024
$21.4M
Pathway discovery, validation and compound identification for Alzheimer's disease - SupplementU01AG046152 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BENNETT, DAVID ALAN, DE JAGER, PHILIP L · 2013 to 2017
$13.6M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010161NIA NIH HHS R01 AG015819NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017917NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIA NIH HHS U01 AG046152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite great increase of the amount of data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS), the genetic background of a partially heritable Alzheimer's disease (AD) is not fully understood yet. Machine learning methods are expected to help researchers in the analysis of the large number of SNPs possibly associated with the disease onset. To date, a number of such approaches were applied to genotype-based classification of AD patients and healthy controls using GWAS data and reported accuracy of 0.65-0.975. However, since the estimated influence of genotype on sporadic AD occurrence is lower than that, these very high classification accuracies may potentially be a result of overfitting. We have explored the possibilities of applying feature selection and classification using random forests to WGS and GWAS data from two datasets. Our results suggest that this approach is prone to overfitting if feature selection is performed before division of data into the training and testing set. Therefore, we recommend avoiding selection of features used to build the model based on data included in the testing set. We suggest that for currently available dataset sizes the expected classifier performance is between 0.55 and 0.7 (AUC) and higher accuracies reported in literature are likely a result of overfitting.

Identifiers

PMID34327330
PMCPMC8315124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.