Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34327305›Full record

ArticleAdvances in methods and practices in psychological science2020

Improving Practices for Selecting a Subset of Important Predictors in Psychology: An Application to Predicting Pain.

Sierra A Bainter, Thomas G McCaulley, Tor Wager, Elizabeth R Losin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in methods and practices in psychological science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Modality-specific associations between sensory differences and autistic traits.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sierra A BainterDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.
Thomas G McCaulleyDepartment of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, CA.
Tor WagerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.
Elizabeth R LosinDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.
University of Miami · USDartmouth College · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

The Neural Bases of Placebo Effects and their Relation to Regulatory ProcessesR01MH076136 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI WAGER, TOR D. · 2007 to 2023
$8.5M
Psychological and brain mechanisms underlying disparities in opioid and non-opioid pain treatment decisionsK01DA045735 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI LOSIN, ELIZABETH R · 2018 to 2022
$861k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA045735NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frequently, researchers in psychology are faced with the challenge of narrowing down a large set of predictors to a smaller subset. There are a variety of ways to do this, but commonly it is done by choosing predictors with the strongest bivariate correlations with the outcome. However, when predictors are correlated, bivariate relationships may not translate into multivariate relationships. Further, any attempts to control for multiple testing are likely to result in extremely low power. Here we introduce a Bayesian variable-selection procedure frequently used in other disciplines, stochastic search variable selection (SSVS). We apply this technique to choosing the best set of predictors of the perceived unpleasantness of an experimental pain stimulus from among a large group of sociocultural, psychological, and neurobiological (functional MRI) individual-difference measures. Using SSVS provides information about which variables predict the outcome, controlling for uncertainty in the other variables of the model. This approach yields new, useful information to guide the choice of relevant predictors. We have provided Web-based open-source software for performing SSVS and visualizing the results.

Indexed as

Bayesian modelingmultiple regressionneuroscienceopen dataopen materialsreproducibilitystochastic search variable selectionuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID34327305
PMCPMC8317830
OpenAlexW3007917530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.