ArticleJournal of interprofessional education & practice2020
An interprofessional training to improve advance care planning skills among medicine, nursing, and social work students.
Article in Journal of interprofessional education & practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating a motivational interviewing-based communication program for nurses in advance care planning: a quasi-experimental study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- The "IP Pub Quiz": a new interprofessional learning activity to improve students' perception of interprofessional education and collaborative practice - a pre-post study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Role self-ascription of professionals conducting advance care planning conversations: A thematic analysis.Palliative medicine · 2025Article
- Using the Perspectives of Advanced Practice Providers to Design Strategies to Increase Engagement of Surgical Patients in Advance Care Planning.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025Article
- Preparing Preclinical Medical Students for Routine Code Status Discussions: A Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2024Article
- Article
- Advance Care Planning and Communication Skills Improve after an Interprofessional Team Simulation with Standardized Patients.Palliative medicine reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Suboptimal training for healthcare students is a recognized barrier to successful completion of advance care planning (ACP) with patients and families. Our study sought to enhance ACP knowledge and communication skills for interprofessional healthcare students. During academic year 2017-2018, 46 students (19-medicine, 16-nursing, and 11-social work), received three training modules delivered by interprofessional faculty. Students subsequently observed a clinical ACP encounter attended by a patient and their family, a clinical social worker, and an internal medicine resident. Three surveys (pre-training T1, post-training T2, and post-clinical encounter T3) evaluated change in student knowledge, communication self-efficacy, ACP self-efficacy, and interprofessional teamwork (using SPICE-R). A randomized waitlist approach was used to test the effects of the clinical ACP training. Student attendance and engagement were high. Relative to baseline, all outcomes differed at all data collection intervals (p < 0.05), except for the SPICE-R from T2 to T3 (p > 0.05). ACP self-efficacy scores declined at T2 before improving at T3. Communication self-efficacy was lower at T2 but improved at T3. Teamwork improved with a medium-large effect (ES = 0.75) at T2 and a large effect (ES = 1.00) at T3. Participant knowledge of ACP improved overall (p < 0.001) as well as for each discipline (p < 0.05). Preliminary findings indicate the interprofessional training experience enhanced student communication skills, ACP knowledge, and appreciation for team-based care. T2 findings demonstrate decrease in communication and ACP self-efficacy, perhaps suggesting students initially underestimated ACP complexity and overestimated their ability to communicate about ACP. T3 findings further suggest that students ultimately benefited from the training experience with meaningful improvements on all key outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.