Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34327121›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of psychiatry2021

Primary care and mental health: Where do we go from here?

Nathalie Moise, Milton Wainberg, Ravi Navin Shah

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Towards understanding and improving medication safety for patients with mental illness in primary care: A multimethod study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  7. Global Is Local: Leveraging Global Mental-Health Methods to Promote Equity and Address Disparities in the United States.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Primary Mental Health Care in a New Era.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathalie MoiseCenter for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Milton WainbergDepartment of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Ravi Navin ShahDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10019, United States. rns2142@cumc.columbia.edu.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USNew York State Psychiatric Institute

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary care has been dubbed the "de facto" mental health system of the United States since the 1970s. Since then, various forms of mental health delivery models for primary care have proven effective in improving patient outcomes and satisfaction and reducing costs. Despite increases in collaborative care implementation and reimbursement, prevalence rates of major depression in the United States remain unchanged while anxiety and suicide rates continue to climb. Meanwhile, primary care task forces in countries like the United Kingdom and Canada are recommending against depression screening in primary care altogether, citing lack of trials demonstrating improved outcomes in screened

Indexed as

AnxietyCollaborative careDepressionIntegrated careMental healthPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID34327121
PMCPMC8311513
OpenAlexW3180982303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.