ArticleCureus2021
Asleep Speech Mapping Using Orofacial Muscles as Surrogates for Motor Speech in Patients Who Cannot Tolerate Awake Surgery: A Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Corticobulbar Motor Evoked Potentials: A Systematic Review of Technical Variations.Neurosurgery practice · 2026Review
- Awake Craniotomy for the Excision of a Pediatric Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation for Language Preservation: A Case Description.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Bi-polar electrical cortical stimulation during awake craniotomy has been the gold standard for mapping eloquent cortex to preserve speech. Unfortunately, not all patients can tolerate awake surgery. Monopolar hi-frequency electrical stimulation can be conducted while a patient is under general anesthesia. Utilizing this technique and targeting the orofacial muscles as surrogates for motor speech may provide a limited alternative to awake cortical mapping in patients unable to undergo surgery awake. Objective To evaluate the utility of asleep motor speech mapping during dominant hemisphere craniotomy for lesion resection in patients who cannot tolerate awake surgery. Methods We describe a series of seven patients who underwent craniotomy for resection of intra-axial lesion in eloquent cortex for whom a novel "asleep speech" cortical stimulation paradigm was used for motor speech preservation. Results Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) from orofacial muscles involved in motor speech were recorded during direct cortical stimulation of eloquent cortex prior to and during lesion resection. Planned resections proceeded in all cases with no adverse neuromonitoring events. Speech was preserved in all patients. Conclusions To preserve motor speech functionality in patients unable to tolerate awake speech mapping, we employed a technique in which asleep neurophysiological mapping is specifically applied to motor cortex controlling the orofacial muscles of phonation and articulation. Further study is necessary regarding the safety and efficacy of this technique for motor speech preservation when awake surgery cannot be performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.