Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34326632›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2021

Why Service Users Choose Medication-Free Psychiatric Treatment: A Mixed-Method Study of User Accounts.

Kari Standal, Ole Andre Solbakken, Jorun Rugkåsa, Astrid Ringen Martinsen, Margrethe Seeger Halvorsen, Allan Abbass, Kristin Sverdvik Heiervang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kari StandalDistrict Psychiatric Center Nedre Romerike, Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9957-1481
Ole Andre SolbakkenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8341-0560
Jorun RugkåsaHealth Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5842-2845
Astrid Ringen MartinsenDistrict Psychiatric Center Nedre Romerike, Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4112-8591
Margrethe Seeger HalvorsenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2391-7594
Allan AbbassFaculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1285-5770
Kristin Sverdvik HeiervangDepartment of Research and Development, Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4553-8771
University of Oslo · NOAkershus University Hospital · NODalhousie University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMedication has been a central part of treatment for severe mental disorders in Western medicine since the 1950s. In 2015, Norwegian Health Authorities decided that Norwegian health regions must have treatment units devoted to medication-free mental health treatment to enhance service users' freedom of choice. The need for these units has been controversial. The aim of this study was to examine why service users choose medication-free services. This article examines what purpose these units serve in terms of the users' reasons for choosing this service, what is important for them to receive during the treatment, and what factors lay behind their concerns in terms of medication-related views and experiences.

methodsQuestionnaires were answered by 46 participants and 5 participants were interviewed in a mixed-method design integrated with a concurrent triangulation strategy applying thematic analysis and descriptive statistics.

resultsNegative effects of medications and unavailable alternatives to medication in ordinary health care were important reasons for wanting medication-free treatment. Medication use may conflict with personal values, attitudes, and beliefs.

conclusionThis study broadens the understanding of why the demand for separate medication-free units has arisen. The findings may contribute to making medication-free treatment an option in mental health care in general. To this end, clinicians are advised to communicate all treatment alternatives to service users and to be mindful of the effect of power imbalances in their interactions with them.

Indexed as

choicemedication-freemental health carepsychotropics

Identifiers

PMID34326632
PMCPMC8315812
OpenAlexW3184662089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.