ArticleJournal of memory and language2021
The pictures who shall not be named: Empirical support for benefits of preview in the Visual World Paradigm.
Article in Journal of memory and language, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing effect latencies in the visual world paradigm: Monte Carlo simulations to assess resampling-based procedures.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Prediction During Within- and Cross-Language Phrase Comprehension: Evidence from Eye-Tracking.Journal of cognition · 2026Article
- Decoupling speech processing from time.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026Review
- Fundamental dimensions of real-time word recognition in challenging listening conditions exhibit within-subject stability and link to outcomes.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2025Article
- The development of lexical processing: Real-time phonological competition and semantic activation in school age children.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2025Article
- The development of real-time spoken and word recognition derives from changes in ability, not maturation.Cognition · 2024Article
- Information entropy facilitates (not impedes) lexical processing during language comprehension.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- Underlying dimensions of real-time word recognition in cochlear implant users.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Analysing data from the psycholinguistic visual-world paradigm: Comparison of different analysis methods.Behavior research methods · 2023Article
- Speakers of different languages remember visual scenes differently.Science advances · 2023Article
- I'm not sure that curve means what you think it means: Toward a [more] realistic understanding of the role of eye-movement generation in the Visual World Paradigm.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Review
- The development of lexical inhibition in spoken word recognition.Developmental psychology · 2023Article
- The development of lexical competition in written- and spoken-word recognition.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023Article
- The profile of real-time competition in spoken and written word recognition: More similar than different.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2022Article
- Idiosyncratic use of bottom-up and top-down information leads to differences in speech perception flexibility: Converging evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking.Brain and language · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A common critique of the Visual World Paradigm (VWP) in psycholinguistic studies is that what is designed as a measure of language processes is meaningfully altered by the visual context of the task. This is crucial, particularly in studies of spoken word recognition, where the displayed images are usually seen as just a part of the measure and are not of fundamental interest. Many variants of the VWP allow participants to sample the visual scene before a trial begins. However, this could bias their interpretations of the later speech or even lead to abnormal processing strategies (e.g., comparing the input to only preactivated working memory representations). Prior work has focused only on whether preview duration changes fixation patterns. However, preview could affect a number of processes, such as visual search, that would not challenge the interpretation of the VWP. The present study uses a series of targeted manipulations of the preview period to ask if preview alters looking behavior during a trial, and why. Results show that evidence of incremental processing and phonological competition seen in the VWP are not dependent on preview, and are not enhanced by manipulations that directly encourage phonological prenaming. Moreover, some forms of preview can eliminate nuisance variance deriving from object recognition and visual search demands in order to produce a more sensitive measure of linguistic processing. These results deepen our understanding of how the visual scene interacts with language processing to drive fixations patterns in the VWP, and reinforce the value of the VWP as a tool for measuring real-time language processing. Stimuli, data and analysis scripts are available at https://osf.io/b7q65/.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.