Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34326412›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Torpor enhances synaptic strength and restores memory performance in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

Christina F de Veij Mestdagh, Jaap A Timmerman, Frank Koopmans, Iryna Paliukhovich, Suzanne S M Miedema, Maaike Goris, Rolinka J van der Loo, Guido Krenning, Ka Wan Li, Huibert D Mansvelder and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The cold truth: torpor as a confound in studies of caloric restriction.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Christina F de Veij MestdaghDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jaap A TimmermanDepartment of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank KoopmansDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Iryna PaliukhovichDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Suzanne S M MiedemaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maaike GorisDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rolinka J van der LooDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Guido KrenningDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ka Wan LiDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Huibert D MansvelderDepartment of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
August B SmitDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert H HenningDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ronald E van KesterenDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ronald.van.kesteren@vu.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hibernation induces neurodegeneration-like changes in the brain, which are completely reversed upon arousal. Hibernation-induced plasticity may therefore be of great relevance for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, but remains largely unexplored. Here we show that a single torpor and arousal sequence in mice does not induce dendrite retraction and synapse loss as observed in seasonal hibernators. Instead, it increases hippocampal long-term potentiation and contextual fear memory. This is accompanied by increased levels of key postsynaptic proteins and mitochondrial complex I and IV proteins, indicating mitochondrial reactivation and enhanced synaptic plasticity upon arousal. Interestingly, a single torpor and arousal sequence was also sufficient to restore contextual fear memory in an APP/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Our study demonstrates that torpor in mice evokes an exceptional state of hippocampal plasticity and that naturally occurring plasticity mechanisms during torpor provide an opportunity to identify unique druggable targets for the treatment of cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAnimalsCognitionDisease Models, AnimalFearHibernationHippocampusLong-Term PotentiationMaleMemoryMemory DisordersMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMitochondriaNeuronal PlasticityNeurons

Identifiers

PMID34326412
PMCPMC8322095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.