Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34326389›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Zooarchaeology through the lens of collagen fingerprinting at Denisova Cave.

Samantha Brown, Naihui Wang, Annette Oertle, Maxim B Kozlikin, Michael V Shunkov, Anatoly P Derevianko, Daniel Comeskey, Blair Jope-Street, Virginia L Harvey, Manasij Pal Chowdhury and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
42.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A new late Neanderthal from Crimea reveals long-distance connections across Eurasia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Paleoproteomics.Chemical reviews · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A primer for ZooMS applications in archaeology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Samantha BrownInstitute for Scientific Archaeology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. brown@shh.mpg.de.
Naihui WangMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Annette OertleMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Maxim B KozlikinInstitute of Archeology and Ethnography, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Michael V ShunkovInstitute of Archeology and Ethnography, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Anatoly P DereviankoInstitute of Archeology and Ethnography, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Daniel ComeskeyOxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, RLAHA, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK.
Blair Jope-StreetMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Virginia L HarveyDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Manasij Pal ChowdhuryDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Michael BuckleyDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Thomas HighamOxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, RLAHA, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK.
Katerina DoukaMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany. douka@shh.mpg.de.
Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History · DESiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RUUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Vienna · ATUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Denisova Cave, a Pleistocene site in the Altai Mountains of Russian Siberia, has yielded significant fossil and lithic evidence for the Pleistocene in Northern Asia. Abundant animal and human bones have been discovered at the site, however, these tend to be highly fragmented, necessitating new approaches to identifying important hominin and faunal fossils. Here we report the results for 8253 bone fragments using ZooMS. Through the integration of this new ZooMS-based data with the previously published macroscopically-identified fauna we aim to create a holistic picture of the zooarchaeological record of the site. We identify trends associated with climate variability throughout the Middle and Upper Pleistocene as well as patterns explaining the process of bone fragmentation. Where morphological analysis of bones from the site have identified a high proportion of carnivore bones (30.2%), we find that these account for only 7.6% of the ZooMS assemblage, with large mammals between 3 and 5 more abundant overall. Our analysis suggests a cyclical pattern in fragmentation of bones which sees initial fragmentation by hominins using percussive tools and secondary carnivore action, such as gnawing and digestion, likely furthering the initial human-induced fragmentation.

Indexed as

AnimalsArchaeologyBone and BonesCarnivoraCavesCollagenFossilsHominidaeHumansPaleontologySiberiaCollagen

Identifiers

PMID34326389
PMCPMC8322063
OpenAlexW3185975249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.