Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34326156›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2021

Objective measurement of lung volume recruitment therapy: laboratory and clinical validation.

Phoebe E Naughton, Nicole Sheers, David J Berlowitz, Mark E Howard, Douglas A McKim, Sherri L Katz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Phoebe E NaughtonInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Nicole SheersInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
David J BerlowitzInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia david.berlowitz@austin.org.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2543-8722
Mark E HowardInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Douglas A McKimMedicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sherri L KatzMedicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung volume recruitment manoeuvres are often prescribed to maintain respiratory health in neuromuscular disease. Unfortunately, no current system accurately records delivered dose. This study determined the performance characteristics of a novel, objective, manual lung volume recruitment bag counter ('the counter') with bench and healthy volunteer testing, as well as in individuals with neuromuscular disease. We undertook (1) bench test determination of activation threshold, (2) bench and healthy volunteer fidelity testing during simulated patient interface leak and different pressure compressions and (3) comparisons with self-report in individuals with neuromuscular disease. The data are reported as summary statistics, compression counts, percentage of recorded versus delivered compressions and concordance (Cohen's kappa (K) and absolute agreement).

resultsMinimum counter activation pressure under conditions of zero leak was 1.9±0.4 cm H

Indexed as

LaboratoriesPositive-Pressure RespirationHumansLung Volume Measurementsassisted ventilationequipment evaluationsexerciselung physiologynon invasive ventilationrespiratory muscles

Identifiers

PMID34326156
PMCPMC8323364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.