Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34326130›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Socioeconomic privilege and political ideology are associated with racial disparity in COVID-19 vaccination.

Ritu Agarwal, Michelle Dugas, Jui Ramaprasad, Junjie Luo, Gujie Li, Guodong Gordon Gao

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions for COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Inequality in the distribution of Covid-19 vaccine: a systematic review.International journal for equity in health · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Environmental Exposures and COVID-19 Experiences in the United States, 2020-2022.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Inherent Bias in Electronic Health Records: A Scoping Review of Sources of Bias.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ritu AgarwalDepartment of Decision, Operations, and Information Technologies, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; ragar@umd.edu.
Michelle DugasDepartment of Decision, Operations, and Information Technologies, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.ORCID 0000-0003-1400-4515
Jui RamaprasadDepartment of Decision, Operations, and Information Technologies, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.ORCID 0000-0001-7339-7457
Junjie LuoDepartment of Decision, Operations, and Information Technologies, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.ORCID 0000-0002-0771-3519
Gujie LiDepartment of Decision, Operations, and Information Technologies, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.ORCID 0000-0003-0685-8238
Guodong Gordon GaoDepartment of Decision, Operations, and Information Technologies, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
University of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine uptake is critical for mitigating the impact of COVID-19 in the United States, but structural inequities pose a serious threat to progress. Racial disparities in vaccination persist despite the increased availability of vaccines. We ask what factors are associated with such disparities. We combine data from state, federal, and other sources to estimate the relationship between social determinants of health and racial disparities in COVID-19 vaccinations at the county level. Analyzing vaccination data from 19 April 2021, when nearly half of the US adult population was at least partially vaccinated, we find associations between racial disparities in COVID-19 vaccination and median income (negative), disparity in high school education (positive), and vote share for the Republican party in the 2020 presidential election (negative), while vaccine hesitancy is not related to disparities. We examine differences in associations for COVID-19 vaccine uptake as compared with influenza vaccine. Key differences include an amplified role for socioeconomic privilege factors and political ideology, reflective of the unique societal context in which the pandemic has unfolded.

Indexed as

PoliticsCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIncomeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesPandemicsRace FactorsRacismSARS-CoV-2Socioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesCOVID-19racial disparitysocial determinants of healthvaccination

Identifiers

PMID34326130
PMCPMC8379950
OpenAlexW3186173753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.