Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34326044›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2021

Fidelity assessment of nurse-led non-pharmacological package of care for knee pain in the package development phase of a feasibility randomised controlled trial based in secondary care: a mixed methods study.

Polykarpos Angelos Nomikos, Michelle Hall, Amy Fuller, Bonnie Millar, Reuben Ogollah, Ana Valdes, Michael Doherty, David A Walsh, Roshan das Nair, A Abhishek

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03670706 (The East-Midlands Knee Pain Multiple Randomised Controlled Trial Cohort Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03670706 nacompletednot on this map

The East-Midlands Knee Pain Multiple Randomised Controlled Trial Cohort Study: Cohort Establishment and Feasibility Cohort-randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2018 to 2021Enrolled1,806ConditionsOsteoarthritis, Knee, Pain, JointArmsExercise, analgesic optimisation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Polykarpos Angelos NomikosAcademic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK polykarpos.nomikos@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6827-4938
Michelle HallNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2231-1507
Amy FullerAcademic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Bonnie MillarNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Reuben OgollahNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ana ValdesNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Michael DohertyAcademic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
David A WalshNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Roshan das NairInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
A AbhishekAcademic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_19095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate fidelity of delivery of a nurse-led non-pharmacological complex intervention for knee pain.

settingSecondary care. Single-centre study. STUDY

designMixed methods study.

participantsEighteen adults with chronic knee pain. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Age >40 years, knee pain present for longer than 3 months, knee pain for most days of the previous month, at least moderate pain in two of the five domains of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain scale.

interventionsNurse-led non-pharmacological intervention comprising assessment, education, exercise, use of hot/cold treatments, footwear modification, walking aids and weight-loss advice (if required). OUTCOMES: Primary: fidelity of delivery of intervention, secondary: nurses' experience of delivering intervention.

methodsEach intervention session with every participant was video recorded and formed part of fidelity assessment. Fidelity checklists were completed by the research nurse after each session and by an independent researcher, after viewing the video-recordings blinded to nurse ratings. Fidelity scores (%), percentage agreement and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated. Two semi-structured interviews were conducted with the research nurse.

resultsFourteen participants completed all visits. 62 treatment sessions took place. Nurse self-report and assessor video rating scores for all 62 treatment sessions were included in fidelity assessment. Overall fidelity was higher on nurse self-report (97.7%) than on objective video-rating (84.2%). Percentage agreement between nurse self-report and video-rating was 73.3% (95% CI 71.3 to 75.3). Fidelity was lowest for advice on footwear and walking aids. The nurse reported difficulty advising on thermal treatments, footwear and walking aids, and did not feel confident negotiating achievable and realistic goals with participants.

conclusionsA trained research nurse can deliver most components of a non-pharmacological intervention for knee pain to a high degree of fidelity. Future research should assess intervention fidelity in a routine clinical setting, and examine its clinical and cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03670706.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeSecondary Health CareAdultFeasibility StudiesHumansKnee JointNurse's RolePainkneemusculoskeletal disordersrheumatology

Identifiers

PMID34326044
PMCPMC8323379
OpenAlexW3185799810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.