Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34325920›Full record

ArticleFertility and sterility2021

Early effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility preferences in the United States: an exploratory study.

Christine H Naya, Darby E Saxbe, Genevieve F Dunton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fertility and sterility, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
19.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine H NayaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: naya@usc.edu.
Darby E SaxbeDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Genevieve F DuntonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
University of Southern California · US

Funding

Novel Statistical Models for Intensive Longitudinal Analyses of Cancer Control BehaviorsR01CA240713 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Genevieve Fridlund Dunton, Donald Hedeker · 2019 to 2026
$4.1M
Microtemporal Processes Underlying Health Behavior Adoption and MaintenanceU01HL146327 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DUNTON, GENEVIEVE FRIDLUND, INTILLE, STEPHEN S · 2018 to 2022
$2.9M
Prenatal Sleep Health, Cortisol, and Gestational Weight GainF31HL154716 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI NAYA, CHRISTINE HOTARU · 2020 to 2022
$94k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240713NHLBI NIH HHS F31 HL154716NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL146327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore early disparate impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility preferences

designCross-sectional study

settingOnline survey questionnaire PATIENT(S): A total of 440 female participants who were trying to conceive (TTC) in the past year or currently are TTC. INTERVENTION(S): No interventions administered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Change in fertility preference RESULT(S): Approximately 1 in 3 participants reported changing their fertility preferences because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Of those that reported changing their fertility preferences, 23.9% reported TTC earlier and 61.6% reported TTC later. Preliminary findings show the odds of changing fertility preferences in black or African American women were 5.45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-19.90) times that of white women and in nonheterosexual women were 2.76 (95% CI, 1.41-5.42) times that of heterosexual women. Furthermore, every 1 unit increase in state anxiety and depressive symptoms was associated with a 26% (95% CI, 3%-54%) or 17% (95% CI, 5%-31%) increase in odds of pushing back TTC, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): This exploratory study highlights how the fertility preferences of racial and ethnic minorities, sexual minorities, and those experiencing mental health issues may be disparately influenced by the pandemic. Research is needed to examine further the disparate effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility preferences.

Indexed as

Sexual and Gender MinoritiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFertilityHumansInfertility, FemaleUnited StatesCoronavirusCOVID-19disparityfertility preferencepandemic

Identifiers

PMID34325920
PMCPMC8421245
OpenAlexW3183489802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.