Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34325744›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2021

A comprehensive approach for microbiota and health monitoring in mouse colonies using metagenomic shotgun sequencing.

Ferdinando Scavizzi, Cristian Bassi, Laura Lupini, Paola Guerriero, Marcello Raspa, Silvia Sabbioni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Single-tube Multiplex Nested PCR System for Efficient Detection of Pathogenic Microorganisms in SPF Rodents.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ferdinando ScavizziNational Research Council (IBBC), CNR-Campus International Development, (EMMA-INFRAFRONTIER- IMPC), Monterotondo Scalo, Italy.
Cristian BassiDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121, Ferrara, Italy.
Laura LupiniDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121, Ferrara, Italy.
Paola GuerrieroDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121, Ferrara, Italy.
Marcello RaspaNational Research Council (IBBC), CNR-Campus International Development, (EMMA-INFRAFRONTIER- IMPC), Monterotondo Scalo, Italy.
Silvia SabbioniLaboratorio Per Le Tecnologie Delle Terapie Avanzate (LTTA), University of Ferrara, 44121, Ferrara, Italy. sbs@unife.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1565-8214

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth surveillance of murine colonies employed for scientific purposes aim at detecting unwanted infection that can affect the well-being of animals and personnel, and potentially undermine scientific results. In this study, we investigated the use of a next-generation sequencing (NGS) metagenomic approach for monitoring the microbiota composition and uncovering the possible presence of pathogens in mice housed in specific pathogen-free (SPF) or conventional (non-SPF) facilities.

resultsAnalysis of metagenomic NGS assay through public and free algorithms and databases allowed to precisely assess the composition of mouse gut microbiome and quantify the contribution of the different microorganisms at the species level. Sequence analysis allowed the uncovering of pathogens or the presence of imbalances in the microbiota composition. In several cases, fecal pellets taken from conventional facilities were found to carry gene sequences from bacterial pathogens (Helicobacter hepaticus, Helicobacter typhlonius, Chlamydia muridarum, Streptococcus pyogenes, Rodentibacter pneumotropicus, Citrobacter rodentium, Staphylococcus aureus), intestinal protozoa (Entamoeba muris, Tritrichomonas muris, Spironucleus muris) nematoda (Aspiculuris tetraptera, Syphacia obvelata), eukaryotic parasites (Myocoptes musculinus) and RNA virus (Norwalk virus). Thus, the use of NGS metagenomics can reduce the number of tests required for the detection of pathogens and avoid the use of sentinel mice.

conclusionsIn summary, in comparison with standard approaches, which require multiple types of test, NGS assay can detect bacteria, fungi, DNA and RNA viruses, and eukaryotic parasites from fecal pellets in a single test. Considering the need to protect animal well-being and to improve the success and reproducibility of preclinical studies, this work provides the proof-of-concept that the use of NGS metagenomics for health monitoring of laboratory mice is a feasible and dependable approach, that is able to broaden the current concept of health monitoring of laboratory mice from "pathogen surveillance" to a more inclusive "microbiota surveillance".

Indexed as

Gut microbiotaHealth surveillanceLaboratory miceMetagenomicsMicrobiomaMouse coloniesNGS shotgun sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34325744
PMCPMC8323313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.