Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34325727›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2021

Disparities in the change of cervical cancer mortality rate between urban and rural Chiang Mai in the era of universal health care and the Thai national screening program.

Patumrat Sripan, Imjai Chitapanarux, Ekkasit Tharavichitkul, Pooriwat Muangwong, Donsuk Pongnikorn, Narate Waisri, Chirapong Hanpragopsuk, Puttachart Maneesai, Panrada Tansiri, Malisa Poungsombat and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Bangkok declarations on cancer control in Asia.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patumrat SripanResearch Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Imjai ChitapanaruxNorthern Thai Research Group of Radiation Oncology (NTRG-RO), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. imjai@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8552-0149
Ekkasit TharavichitkulNorthern Thai Research Group of Radiation Oncology (NTRG-RO), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Pooriwat MuangwongNorthern Thai Research Group of Radiation Oncology (NTRG-RO), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Donsuk PongnikornCancer Registry Unit, Lampang Cancer Hospital, Lampang, Thailand.
Narate WaisriChiang Mai Cancer Registry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Chirapong HanpragopsukChiang Mai Cancer Registry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Puttachart ManeesaiChiang Mai Cancer Registry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Panrada TansiriChiang Mai Cancer Registry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Malisa PoungsombatChiang Mai Cancer Registry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Varunee KhamsanChiang Mai Cancer Registry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Chiang Mai University · THLampang Cancer Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Ministry of Public Health of Thailand established universal health coverage (UHC) in 2002, which also included national-level screening for cervical cancer in 2005. This study examined the changes in mortality of cervical cancer in rural and urban areas in Chiang Mai Province of northern Thailand during the era of UHC and the immediately preceding period.

methodsData of cervical cancer patients in Chiang Mai in northern Thailand, who died from 1998 through 2012, were used to calculate the change in age-standardized rates of mortality (ASMR) using a joinpoint regression model and to calculate estimated annual percent changes (APC). The change in mortality rate by age groups along with changes by geographic area of residence were determined.

resultsAmong the 1177 patients who died from cervical cancer, 13(1%), 713 (61%) and 451 (38%) were in the young age group (aged < 30), the screening target group (aged 30-59) and the elderly group (aged ≥60), respectively. The mortality rate among women aged 30-59 significantly declined by 3% per year from 2003 through 2012 (p < 0.001). By area of residence, the mortality rate in women targeted by the screening program significantly decreased in urban areas but remained stable in more rural areas, APC of - 7.6 (95% CI: - 12.1 to - 2.8) and APC of 3.7 (95% CI: - 2.1 to 9.9), respectively.

conclusionThe UHC and national cervical cancer screening program in Thai women may have contributed to the reduction of the mortality rate of cervical cancer in the screening target age group. However, this reduction was primarily in urban areas of Chiang Mai, and there was no significant impact on mortality in more rural areas. These results suggest that the reasons for this disparity need to be further explored to equitably increase access to cervical cancer services of the UHC.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesRural HealthUrban HealthUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsThailandUniversal Health CareArea of residenceCervical cancerDisparityMortality trendScreening

Identifiers

PMID34325727
PMCPMC8323343
OpenAlexW3183254831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.