Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34325688›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2021

Health care ethics programs in U.S. Hospitals: results from a National Survey.

Marion Danis, Ellen Fox, Anita Tarzian, Christopher C Duke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Leaving the Bedside to Mend the Bedside: Influencing Public Policy.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. It's Worth What You Can Sell It for: A Survey of Employment and Compensation Models for Clinical Ethicists.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marion DanisDepartment of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Rm 1C118, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1156, USA. mdanis@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-4749-4568
Ellen FoxFox Ethics Consulting, Arlington, VA, 22213, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9029-7052
Anita TarzianNational Center for Ethics in Health Care, Veterans Health Administration, 811 Vermont St. NW., Washington, DC, 20571, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0237-5311
Christopher C DukeAltarum Institute, 3520 Green Ct., Suite 300, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3022-6257

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs hospitals have grown more complex, the ethical concerns they confront have grown correspondingly complicated. Many hospitals have consequently developed health care ethics programs (HCEPs) that include far more than ethics consultation services alone. Yet systematic research on these programs is lacking.

methodsBased on a national, cross-sectional survey of a stratified sample of 600 US hospitals, we report on the prevalence, scope, activities, staffing, workload, financial compensation, and greatest challenges facing HCEPs.

resultsAmong 372 hospitals whose informants responded to an online survey, 97% of hospitals have HCEPs. Their scope includes clinical ethics functions in virtually all hospitals, but includes other functions in far fewer hospitals: ethical leadership (35.7%), regulatory compliance (29.0%), business ethics (26.2%), and research ethics (12.6%). HCEPs are responsible for providing ongoing ethics education to various target audiences including all staff (77.0%), nurses (59.9%), staff physicians (49.0%), hospital leadership (44.2%), medical residents (20.3%) and the community/general public (18.4%). HCEPs staff are most commonly involved in policy work through review of existing policies but are less often involved in development of new policies. HCEPs have an ethics representative in executive leadership in 80.5% of hospitals, have representation on other hospital committees in 40.7%, are actively engaged in community outreach in 22.6%, and lead large-scale ethics quality improvement initiatives in 17.7%. In general, major teaching hospitals and urban hospitals have the most highly integrated ethics programs with the broadest scope and greatest number of activities. Larger hospitals, academically affiliated hospitals, and urban hospitals have significantly more individuals performing HCEP work and significantly more individuals receiving financial compensation specifically for that work. Overall, the most common greatest challenge facing HCEPs is resource shortages, whereas underutilization is the most common greatest challenge for hospitals with fewer than 100 beds. Respondents' strategies for managing challenges include staff training and additional funds.

conclusionsWhile this study must be cautiously interpreted due to its limitations, the findings may be useful for understanding the characteristics of HCEPs in US hospitals and the factors associated with these characteristics. This information may contribute to exploring ways to strengthen HCEPs.

Indexed as

Ethics ConsultationCross-Sectional StudiesEthics, ClinicalEthics Committees, ClinicalHospitals, TeachingHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesEmpirical researchEthics, institutionalHealthcare ethicsSurvey

Identifiers

PMID34325688
PMCPMC8320092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.