Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34325675›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2021

Using a self-directed workbook to support advance care planning with long term care home residents.

Tamara Sussman, Sharon Kaasalainen, Jack Lawrence, Paulette V Hunter, Valerie Bourgeois-Guerin, Michelle Howard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tamara SussmanMcGill University School of Social Work, 3506 University St. #300, Montreal, QC, H3A 2A7, Canada. tamara.sussman@mcgill.ca.
Sharon KaasalainenFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, 2J20L8S 4K1, Canada.
Jack LawrenceMcGill University School of Social Work, 3506 University St. #300, Montreal, QC, H3A 2A7, Canada.
Paulette V HunterUniversity of Saskatchewan, St Thomas More College, Psychology, 9 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A5, Canada.
Valerie Bourgeois-GuerinDepartment of Psychology, University of Quebec in Montreal, 100 Sherbrook St West, Montreal, QC, H3C 3P8, Canada.
Michelle HowardDepartment of Family Medicine, David Braley Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, 100 Main Street West, 5th floor, Hamilton, On, L8P 1H6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile advance care planning (ACP) has been shown to improve the quality of end-of-life (EOL) communication and palliative care, it is rarely practiced in long term care (LTC) homes, where staff time to support the process is limited. This study examines the potential of a publicly available self-directed ACP workbook distributed to LTC residents to encourage ACP reflection and communication.

methodsRecruitment took place across three LTC homes, between June 2018 and July 2019. To be eligible, residents had to have medical stability, cognitive capacity, and English literacy. The study employed a mixed methods concurrent design using the combination of ranked (quantitative) and open (qualitative) workbook responses to examine documented care preferences and ACP reflections and communications.

results58 residents initially agreed to participate in the study of which 44 completed self-directed ACP workbooks. Our combined quantitative and qualitative results suggested that the workbooks supported the elicitation of a range of resident care preferences of relevance for EOL care planning and decision making. For example, ranked data highlighted that most residents want to remain involved in decisions pertaining to their care (70%), even though less than half expect their wishes to be applied without discretion (48%). Ranked data further revealed many residents value quality of life over quantity of life (55%) but a sizable minority are concerned they will not receive enough care at EOL (20%). Open comments affirmed and expanded on ranked data by capturing care preferences not explored in the ranked data such as preferences around spiritual care and post mortem planning. Analysis of all open comments also suggested that while the workbook elicited many reflections that could be readily communicated to family/friends or staff, evidence that conversations had occurred was less evident in recorded workbook responses.

conclusionsACP workbooks may be useful for supporting the elicitation of resident care preferences and concerns in LTC. Developing follow up protocols wherein residents are supported in communicating their workbook responses to families/friends and staff may be a critical next step in improving ACP engagement in LTC. Such protocols would require staff training and an organizational culture that empowers staff at all levels to engage in follow up conversations with residents.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningLong-Term CareTerminal CareCommunicationHumansNursing HomesQuality of LifeAdvance care planningEnd-of-life communicationLong-term carePalliative care

Identifiers

PMID34325675
PMCPMC8323265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.