Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34325663›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2021

Simulation studies to optimize genomic selection in honey bees.

Richard Bernstein, Manuel Du, Andreas Hoppe, Kaspar Bienefeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Richard BernsteinInstitute for Bee Research Hohen Neuendorf, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, 16540, Hohen Neuendorf, Germany. richard.bernstein@hu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7777-4272
Manuel DuInstitute for Bee Research Hohen Neuendorf, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, 16540, Hohen Neuendorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2264-1610
Andreas HoppeInstitute for Bee Research Hohen Neuendorf, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, 16540, Hohen Neuendorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5181-6411
Kaspar BienefeldInstitute for Bee Research Hohen Neuendorf, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, 16540, Hohen Neuendorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5201-475X

Funding

Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft 742 397European Commission 613960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the completion of a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chip for honey bees, the technical basis of genomic selection is laid. However, for its application in practice, methods to estimate genomic breeding values need to be adapted to the specificities of the genetics and breeding infrastructure of this species. Drone-producing queens (DPQ) are used for mating control, and usually, they head non-phenotyped colonies that will be placed on mating stations. Breeding queens (BQ) head colonies that are intended to be phenotyped and used to produce new queens. Our aim was to evaluate different breeding program designs for the initiation of genomic selection in honey bees.

methodsStochastic simulations were conducted to evaluate the quality of the estimated breeding values. We developed a variation of the genomic relationship matrix to include genotypes of DPQ and tested different sizes of the reference population. The results were used to estimate genetic gain in the initial selection cycle of a genomic breeding program. This program was run over six years, and different numbers of genotyped queens per year were considered. Resources could be allocated to increase the reference population, or to perform genomic preselection of BQ and/or DPQ.

resultsIncluding the genotypes of 5000 phenotyped BQ increased the accuracy of predictions of breeding values by up to 173%, depending on the size of the reference population and the trait considered. To initiate a breeding program, genotyping a minimum number of 1000 queens per year is required. In this case, genetic gain was highest when genomic preselection of DPQ was coupled with the genotyping of 10-20% of the phenotyped BQ. For maximum genetic gain per used genotype, more than 2500 genotyped queens per year and preselection of all BQ and DPQ are required.

conclusionsThis study shows that the first priority in a breeding program is to genotype phenotyped BQ to obtain a sufficiently large reference population, which allows successful genomic preselection of queens. To maximize genetic gain, DPQ should be preselected, and their genotypes included in the genomic relationship matrix. We suggest, that the developed methods for genomic prediction are suitable for implementation in genomic honey bee breeding programs.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticSelective BreedingAnimalsBeesGenome, InsectGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotyping Techniques

Identifiers

PMID34325663
PMCPMC8323320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.