Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34325612›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: misinformation and perceptions of vaccine safety.

Katherine Kricorian, Rachel Civen, Ozlem Equils

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 224 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
224citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
43.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

224 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 438 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. What Do We Know About Rural Mobile Health Clinics? A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

164 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katherine KricorianMiOra, Encino, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3246-5879
Rachel CivenLos Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ozlem EquilsMiOra, Encino, CA, USA.
Los Angeles County Department of Public Health · USMizoram University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite COVID-19's devastating toll, many Americans remain unwilling to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. The authors conducted a US national survey to understand the health literacy of adults regarding the vaccine, as well as their COVID-19 beliefs and experiences. People who believed the COVID-19 vaccine was unsafe were less willing to receive the vaccine, knew less about the virus and were more likely to believe COVID-19 vaccine myths. On average, they were less educated, lower income, and more rural than people who believed the vaccine is safe. The results highlight the importance of developing clear health communications accessible to individuals from varied socioeconomic and educational backgrounds.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health CommunicationVaccinesAdultCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2United StatesVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesCOVID-19health inequitieshealth literacySARS-COV-2socioeconomicvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID34325612
PMCPMC8920251
OpenAlexW3185755553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.