Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34325432›Full record

ArticleEuropean surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes2022

Comparing the First and Second Wave of COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Recipients: An East-European Perspective.

Florin Ioan Elec, Sorana D Bolboacă, Adriana Muntean, Alina Daciana Elec, Cristina Cismaru, Mihaela Lupşe, Mihai Oltean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. COVID-19 and kidney transplantation: the impact of remdesivir on renal function and outcome - a retrospective cohort study.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients: an overview of the Swedish national experience.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Florin Ioan ElecClinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Sorana D BolboacăDepartment of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Adriana MunteanClinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Alina Daciana ElecClinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Cristina CismaruDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Mihaela LupşeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Mihai OlteanTransplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study examined whether patient characteristics, management, and outcome of kidney transplant recipients (KTx) with COVID-19 changed in the second versus the first pandemic wave.

methodsWe reviewed all available data (demographics, medical history, comorbidities, therapeutic interventions, and outcome) on our KTx with COVID-19 during the first wave (March-September 2020, n = 33) and the second wave (October 2020-February 2021, n = 149) of the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsOne hundred eighty-two out of our 1,503 KTx in active follow-up got COVID-19 during 12-month period, corresponding to a prevalence of 12.1%. No difference was found in age, gender distribution, comorbidities, body mass index, or baseline immunosuppression between the 2 COVID-19 waves. Bilateral COVID pneumonia was more frequent during the first wave. More KTx were managed as outpatients during the second wave (15 vs. 39%, p < 0.01). Calcineurin inhibitors were more sparingly reduced during the second wave, whereas antimetabolites were similarly reduced (91 vs. 86, p = ns). Admission to intensive care units was comparable between the first (27%) and second waves (23%). During the first wave, 8 out of 9 patients (89%) requiring intensive care died, whereas the mortality of the ICU patients in the second wave was 68% (23 deaths) (p = 0.2). The overall mortality was 24% during the first wave and 16% during the second wave (p = 0.21), while in-hospital mortality was identical between the CO-VID-19 waves (27%). Increasing age and poor allograft function were significant predictors of mortality.

conclusionsMost patient characteristics and outcome were comparable between the first 2 COVID-19 waves. More KTx were managed as outpatients without an overall negative impact on outcome.

Indexed as

COVID-19Kidney TransplantationHumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Epidemic waveKidney transplantationOutcome

Identifiers

PMID34325432
PMCPMC8450821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.