Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34325220›Full record

ArticleEnvironment international2021

Optimal selection of monitoring sites in cities for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in sewage networks.

Eusebi Calle, David Martínez, Roser Brugués-I-Pujolràs, Miquel Farreras, Joan Saló-Grau, Josep Pueyo-Ros, Lluís Corominas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environment international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eusebi CalleInstitute of Informatics and Applications, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain. Electronic address: eusebi.calle@udg.edu.
David MartínezCatalan Institute for Water Research, Emili Grahit 101, 17003 Girona, Spain. Electronic address: dmartinez@icra.cat.
Roser Brugués-I-PujolràsInstitute of Informatics and Applications, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain. Electronic address: u1059680@campus.udg.edu.
Miquel FarrerasInstitute of Informatics and Applications, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain. Electronic address: miquel.farreras@udg.edu.
Joan Saló-GrauInstitute of Informatics and Applications, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain. Electronic address: u1953621@campus.udg.edu.
Josep Pueyo-RosCatalan Institute for Water Research, Emili Grahit 101, 17003 Girona, Spain. Electronic address: jpueyo@icra.cat.
Lluís CorominasCatalan Institute for Water Research, Emili Grahit 101, 17003 Girona, Spain. Electronic address: lcorominas@icra.cat.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selecting sampling points to monitor traces of SARS-CoV-2 in sewage at the intra-urban scale is no trivial task given the complexity of the networks and the multiple technical, economic and socio-environmental constraints involved. This paper proposes two algorithms for the automatic selection of sampling locations in sewage networks. The first algorithm, is for the optimal selection of a predefined number of sampling locations ensuring maximum coverage of inhabitants and minimum overlapping amongst selected sites (static approach). The second is for establishing a strategy of iterations of sample&analysis to identify patient zero and hot spots of COVID-19 infected inhabitants in cities (dynamic approach). The algorithms are based on graph-theory and are coupled to a greedy optimization algorithm. The usefulness of the algorithms is illustrated in the case study of Girona (NE Iberian Peninsula, 148,504 inhabitants). The results show that the algorithms are able to automatically propose locations for a given number of stations. In the case of Girona, always covering more than 60% of the manholes and with less than 3% of them overlapping amongst stations. Deploying 5, 6 or 7 stations results in more than 80% coverage in manholes and more than 85% of the inhabitants. For the dynamic sensor placement, we demonstrate that assigning infection probabilities to each manhole as a function of the number of inhabitants connected reduces the number of iterations required to detect the zero patient and the hot spot areas.

Indexed as

COVID-19SewageCitiesHumansSARS-CoV-2WastewaterSewageWastewaterCOVID-19Graph theorySensor placementSewerWastewater-based epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID34325220
PMCPMC8430229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.