Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34325124›Full record

SynthesisPublic health2021

COVID-19, corticosteroids and public health: a reappraisal.

M Fernandes, J Brábek

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M FernandesMedbase, 114 Milton Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA. Electronic address: mfmedbase@gmail.com.
J BrábekDepartment of Cell Biology, Charles University, Viničná 7, Prague, Czech Republic; Biotechnology and Biomedicine Centre of the Academy of Sciences and Charles University (BIOCEV), Průmyslová 595, Vestec U Prahy, 25242, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess whether regulatory guidance on the use of dexamethasone in hospitalised COVID-19 patients is applicable to the larger population of COVID-19 cases. The surge in worldwide demand for dexamethasone suggests that the guidance, although correct, has not emphasised the danger of its wider use. STUDY

designData from the Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy (RECOVERY) trial and the World Health Organisation (WHO) prospective meta-analysis have been deconstructed and analysed.

methodsTo provide context, relevant publications were identified in PubMed using the following keywords: COVID-19, RECOVERY trial, WHO meta-analysis, variants, immunity, public health.

resultsThe WHO guidance 'Corticosteroids for COVID-19' was based on their prospective meta-analysis. This meta-analysis was weighted by data from the RECOVERY trial.

conclusionsIn terms of COVID-19, dexamethasone has value in a narrow indication, namely, in hospitalised patients requiring respiratory support. The media blitz likely resulted in the wider use of dexamethasone in outpatients and as a preventive medication. This is reflected in the surge in worldwide demand for dexamethasone. We ask whether the use of steroids, beyond regulatory indications, may be responsible for the recent increase in mortality and especially the emergence of mucormycosis? From the public health standpoint, the current guidance for use of dexamethasone in COVID-19 could benefit from clarification and the addition of a cautionary note.

Indexed as

COVID-19Adrenal Cortex HormonesHumansProspective StudiesPublic HealthSARS-CoV-2Adrenal Cortex HormonesCOVID-19ImmunityPublic healthRECOVERY trialVariantsWHO meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID34325124
PMCPMC8180552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.