Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34324986›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics2021

Electrostatic spray drying for monoclonal antibody formulation.

Tarun Tejasvi Mutukuri, Yuh-Fun Maa, Benson Gikanga, Robert Sakhnovsky, Qi Tony Zhou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tarun Tejasvi MutukuriDepartment of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, 575 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Yuh-Fun MaaPharmaceutical Development, Genentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.
Benson GikangaPharmaceutical Development, Genentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.
Robert SakhnovskyFluid Air, 2119 Fisher Drive, Naperville, IL 60563, USA.
Qi Tony ZhouDepartment of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, 575 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. Electronic address: tonyzhou@purdue.edu.
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Advancing innovative therapies against pandrug-resistant Gram-negative superbugsR01AI146160 · NIAID · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JIAN, ZHOU, QI · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Combating Deadly Gram-negative Lung Infections: An Inhalation and Systems ApproachR01AI132681 · NIAID · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JIAN, ZHOU, QI · 2017 to 2020
$2.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI132681NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI146160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explored the feasibility of electrostatic spray drying for producing a monoclonal antibody (mAb) powder formulation at lower drying temperatures than conventional spray drying and its effect on protein stability. A mAb formulation was dried by either conventional spray drying or electrostatic spray drying with charge (ESD). The protein powders were then characterized using solid-state Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ssFTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), size exclusion chromatography (SEC), and solid-state hydrogen/deuterium exchange with mass spectrometry (ssHDX-MS). Particle characterizations such as BET surface area, particle size distribution, and particle morphology were also performed. Conventional spray drying of the mAb formulation at the inlet temperature of 70 °C failed to generate dry powders due to poor drying efficiency; electrostatic spray drying at the same temperature and 5 kV charge enabled the formation of powder formulation with satisfactory moisture contents. Deconvoluted peak areas of deuterated samples from the ssHDX-MS study showed a good correlation with the loss of the monomeric peak area measured by size exclusion chromatography in the 90-day accelerated stability study conducted at 40 °C. Low-temperature (70 °C inlet temperature) drying with an electrostatic charge (5 kV) led to better protein physical stability as compared with the samples spray-dried at the high temperature (130 °C inlet temperature) without charge. This study shows that electrostatic spray drying can produce solid monoclonal antibody formulation at lower inlet temperature than traditional spray drying with better physical stability.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalChemistry, PharmaceuticalFreeze DryingParticle SizePowdersSpray DryingStatic ElectricityAntibodies, MonoclonalPowdersElectrostatic spray dryingPhysical stabilityProtein structureSolid formulationsolid-state hydrogen/deuterium exchange with mass spectrometric analysis (ssHDX-MS)

Identifiers

PMID34324986
PMCPMC8462225
OpenAlexW3184063831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.