ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics2021
Electrostatic spray drying for monoclonal antibody formulation.
Article in International journal of pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- SLC4A9 deficiency is involved in Sjögren's syndrome and enamel defects through RPS27-triggered ribosomal stress.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Spray Freeze Drying for Solid Formulations of RNA Lipid Nanoparticles.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Particle Design for High-Concentration Protein Suspension Injectables.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Electrostatic Spray Drying of a Milk Protein Matrix-Impact on Maillard Reactions.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Understanding the impact of mannitol on physical stability and aerosolization of spray-dried protein powders for inhalation.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Magnetic chitin beads (MCB) coated withGut microbes · 2023Article
- Comparison of Electrostatic Spray Drying, Spray Drying, and Freeze Drying forFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study explored the feasibility of electrostatic spray drying for producing a monoclonal antibody (mAb) powder formulation at lower drying temperatures than conventional spray drying and its effect on protein stability. A mAb formulation was dried by either conventional spray drying or electrostatic spray drying with charge (ESD). The protein powders were then characterized using solid-state Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ssFTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), size exclusion chromatography (SEC), and solid-state hydrogen/deuterium exchange with mass spectrometry (ssHDX-MS). Particle characterizations such as BET surface area, particle size distribution, and particle morphology were also performed. Conventional spray drying of the mAb formulation at the inlet temperature of 70 °C failed to generate dry powders due to poor drying efficiency; electrostatic spray drying at the same temperature and 5 kV charge enabled the formation of powder formulation with satisfactory moisture contents. Deconvoluted peak areas of deuterated samples from the ssHDX-MS study showed a good correlation with the loss of the monomeric peak area measured by size exclusion chromatography in the 90-day accelerated stability study conducted at 40 °C. Low-temperature (70 °C inlet temperature) drying with an electrostatic charge (5 kV) led to better protein physical stability as compared with the samples spray-dried at the high temperature (130 °C inlet temperature) without charge. This study shows that electrostatic spray drying can produce solid monoclonal antibody formulation at lower inlet temperature than traditional spray drying with better physical stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.