Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34324933›Full record

Trial reportBrazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)

Hemodynamic impact of increasing time between fentanyl and propofol administration during anesthesia induction: a randomised, clinical trial.

Paula A Vullo, Mar Ía I Real Navacerrada, Ricardo Navarro Suay

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paula A VulloHospital Central de la Defensa G..mez Ulla-IMIDEF, Critical Care and Pain Unit, Department of Anesthesia, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: agosvullo@hotmail.com.
Mar Ía I Real NavacerradaHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Critical Care and Pain Unit, Department of Anesthesia, Madrid, Spain.
Ricardo Navarro SuayHospital Central de la Defensa G..mez Ulla-IMIDEF, Critical Care and Pain Unit, Department of Anesthesia, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Central de la Defensa Gómez Ulla · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveAnesthesia induction can produce severe propofol dose-dependent hypotension. Fentanyl coadministration reduces the catecholaminergic response to orotracheal intubation allowing propofol dose reduction. The aim of this study is to determine whether the hemodynamic response is improved by increasing the time between fentanyl and propofol administration and reducing the dose of the latter without increasing the time to achieve optimal hypnosis.

methodsAfter approval by the Research Ethics Committee, patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery with endotracheal intubation were randomized by a computer-generated table into six time-dose groups (1 or 2...minutes/1, 1.5, or 2...mg.kg

resultsOf the 192 recruited patients, 186 completed the study (1...min group n...=...94; 2...min group n...=...92). It was observed that HR and BP decreased after propofol administration and increased after intubation in all groups (p...<...0.0001). In patients over 55 years, the 2 min ... 2 mg.kg

conclusionIncreasing the time between the administration of fentanyl and propofol by up to two minutes results in greater hypotension in patients over 55 years.

Indexed as

HypotensionPropofolAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthetics, IntravenousFentanylHemodynamicsHumansIntubation, IntratrachealAnesthetics, IntravenousFentanylPropofolFentanylGeneral anesthesiaHemodynamicsIntravenous anesthesiaPropofol

Identifiers

PMID34324933
PMCPMC10877358
OpenAlexW3184644299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.