Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34324832›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2021

Predicting individual neuron responses with anatomically constrained task optimization.

Omer Mano, Matthew S Creamer, Bara A Badwan, Damon A Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fly navigational responses exploit plume-specific odor motion and gradient cues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Broken time-reversal symmetry in visual motion detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Optimization in Visual Motion Estimation.Annual review of vision science · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Broken time reversal symmetry in visual motion detection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Omer ManoDepartment of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Matthew S CreamerInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Bara A BadwanSchool of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Damon A ClarkDepartment of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. Electronic address: damon.clark@yale.edu.

Funding

Yale Core Grant for Vision ResearchP30EY026878 · NEI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI In-Jung Kim · 2016 to 2026
$7.1M
Integrating visual counterevidence to detect self-motion in a small visual circuitR01EY026555 · NEI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CLARK, DAMON ALISTAIR · 2016 to 2025
$4.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026878NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial neural networks trained to solve sensory tasks can develop statistical representations that match those in biological circuits. However, it remains unclear whether they can reproduce properties of individual neurons. Here, we investigated how artificial networks predict individual neuron properties in the visual motion circuits of the fruit fly Drosophila. We trained anatomically constrained networks to predict movement in natural scenes, solving the same inference problem as fly motion detectors. Units in the artificial networks adopted many properties of analogous individual neurons, even though they were not explicitly trained to match these properties. Among these properties was the split into ON and OFF motion detectors, which is not predicted by classical motion detection models. The match between model and neurons was closest when models were trained to be robust to noise. These results demonstrate how anatomical, task, and noise constraints can explain properties of individual neurons in a small neural network.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerNeuronsAnimalsDrosophilaMovementanatomical constraintsartificial neural networkDrosophilamachine learningmotion detectionmotion estimationneural circuitsvisual circuits

Identifiers

PMID34324832
PMCPMC8741219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.